HOME     |     PHYSICS     |     BIOLOGY     |     CHEMISTRY


EDITORIAL NOTE

We provide below the link to the public pleadings of the lawsuit filed by Ruggero and Carla Santilli, Plaintiffs, against Frank Israel, Pepjin van Erp et al, Defendants

Lawsuit against Frank Israel and Pepjin van Erp

while offering to the scientific community the possibility of expressing comments in an anonymous way without editorial contributions except for the of screening of posts with Wikipedia rules. Posts up to 150 words can be placed in the message box, while longer posts, pictures and and documents n should be emailed to "admin(at)galileoprincipia(dot)



Post 1.
For God's sake, can anybody outline why the Santilli's sued Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp? Thanks. Zwe44ui

Post 2.
I looked at the court documents/pleadings that are available on the internet. I was astonished to see the unprovoked, relentless and vicious attacks carried out at the personal, scientific and industrial levels by Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp (FII and PVE) against a senior scientist such as Prof. Santilli (see his Biographical Notes and the Full Curriculum) . One should inspect the first filing 0 Doc. 064 P Motion . Motion 064 2018-03-17 09:39 6 of Public Pleadings, especially the attachments. The unprovoked attacks for seven years were launched by Frank Israel, Pepijin van Erp and others via numerous websites of the Dutch Skeptic Society and in Dutch, English, French, German and Italian , such as
https://kloptdatwel.nl/search_gcse/?q=Ruggero%20Santilli
http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/2016/02/the-continuing-stupidity-of-ruggero-santilli/
http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/articles/finding-jerdsey-v-kadeisvili-or-mailing-withruggero-m-santilli
http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/2016/11/sued-by-ruggero-santilli
http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/2016/08/santilli-shenanigans
http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl

These internet attacks were then translated in Dutch, Italian, French and German websites. To understand the dimension of this organized international slander, Frank Israel and his employee Pepijin van Erp have worked full time for years via the use of illegal SEO techniques to keep these slanderous websites at the top of Google search under Santilli as, anybody can verify, resulting in tens of thousands of websites all over the world. All written requests for moderation by Carla Santilli personally to Frank Israel were ignored.

Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp used these defaming websites to disrupt Santilli's personal, scientific and industrial activities. As an illustration, Santilli and his group had participated for five years to the series of conferences ICNAAM organized in Greece by Theodore Simos. See in particular the (see the Program-ICNAAM-2014 showing the name Santilli in titles, let alone the content, most of the 2014 conference. Such a great success by Santilli was clearly a disproof of the slanderous websites. Therefore, Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp convinced Robert Brown, then President of the American Institute of Physics - AIP (a notorious member of their ring) to have Simos stop admitting Santilli and his group at his meetings under threat of stopping the AIP publication of his proceedings. Simos had no other choice than to comply, Santilli and his group, including distinguished full professors from prestigious universities were prohibited to attend, and we, Americans lost our face in scientific circles on three continents.

The unprovoked industrial damage cased by Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp to Santilli and his associates is rather substantial. As you can see in his Biographical Notes, Santilli is the founder and stockholder of two publicly traded companies, one traded at NASDAQ and the other traded at the OTC. The vicious attacks in corporate blogs by Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp have been so organized, relentless and vulgar to cause millions of dollars of losses in the value of the stock owned by tens of thousands of stockholders (see the sworn Affidavits of corporate officers in the attachments of indicated first filing). Predictable huge pressure on Santilli to sue by stockholders and investors alike, left the Santilli's no other choice than to sue Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp. There are rumors that a disgusted investor from New York has offered unlimietd funds for the lawsuits, first in the U.S.A. and perhaps later on - in Europe.

The issues of direct relevance to the U. S. as well as international physics community are endless, such as: have Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp acted on their own or under a mandate from higher levels of their ring? Why was this relentless and vicious attack launched? Who are the beneficiaries? Should the U.S.A. keep tolerating these vicious attacks by foreigners? What are the implications for much needed new technologies, etc. Vsa45uo

Post 3.
According to an Investigative Agency hired by the International Committee on Scientific Ethics and Accountabilty (ICSEAA), Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp were commissioned to do their unethical campaign against the Santilli's by Arthur Rubin, David Epstein and Frank Bernstein, controllers of the Wikipedia "Article" on Santilli. As everybody can see, that Article has been structured and kept for decades to discredit Santilli's research because his beliefs are not aligned with the main interests of the Wikipedia-academic complex. In fact, said editors quote in the article the absolute most unprofessional and unqualified sources such as Pepijin van Erp who has no formal education at all, let alone any education in the post Ph. D. research by Santilli, while carefully avoiding the quotation of Santilli's articles published in refereed journals that are not aligned with their interests. It should be known that said editor set the article to automatic rejection of any improvements whatsoever by numerous scientists around the globe for decades. Clearly, the discereditation of Santilli's research in the Wikipedia article needed some form of external back up.

The same Investigative Agency has also uncovered that Rubin-Epstein-Weinstein and their global associates perpetrated truly incredible acts of scientific gangsterism, such as: commissioning the journalist member of their group Carrie Weimar to write a negative profile on Santilli, which she did (see said Article); commissioning the "engineer" J. M. Calo at Brown University, RI, another notorious member of said interests, to write a paper of strong criticism on Santilli's post Ph. D. discovery in "chemistry" of the new chemical special of magnecules, who, of course, did as requested; use the unfortunate credibility the negative depiction of Santilli in Wikipedia, obstructed Santilli's technical presentation at NASA in the use of his new species to improve safety and trust for aerospace rosiest; and perpetrated additional true acts of "scientific banditism"; requested the organizers of the 2014 International Conference by the American Institute of Applied Sciences held in Madrid, Spain http://aimsciences.org/conferences/2014/index.html To close the already organized session on Santilli's Isodifferential Calculus and Lie Santilli theory with ensuing investigation initiated by the organizers (Carla Santilli and other participants can provide affidavit of the case); and did additional true acts of "scientific banditism" hardly credible for their protracted impunity. Jer45io

Post 4.
To my knowledge as a follower of Santilli's research for years, the origin of the lawsuit by the Santilli's against Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp must be traced back to Septemebr 1987 when R. M. Santilli became a member of the faculty of then Lyman Laboratory of Physics of Harvard University whose history is described in all details in his 1984 book [1] Il Grande Grido - Ethical Problem of Einstein followers in the U.S.A: An Insider's View, in which the link includes the Documentation of Il Grande Grido, Vols. I, II and III (1985) Alpha Publishing.

It appears that this particular lawsuit provides final evidence on the conspiracy against the research by Ruggero M. Santilli by "organized academic, financial and ethnic interests on Einstein" [1] because he dared to surpass Einstein at the mathematical, theoretical and experimental levels. These studies were not intended for the conditions conceived by Einstein (dynamical problem in vacuum), but for much more complex conditions unthinkable during Einstein's time, dynamical problems within physical media which admit Einstein's conditions as a particular case. To understand the illegal character of the conspiracy, we should indicate upfront that the "inapplicability" of Einstein theories for dynamics within physical media is beyond scientific doubt for endless reasons treated in refereed papers, e.g.,: Einstein's theories are reversible over time while the indicated interior condition processes are irreversible; it is impossible to define special and general relativity within physical media; it is impossible to verify the assumed constancy of the speed of light within physical media due to the lack of an inertial reference frame; the speed of light within physical media (when transparent) is locally varying in any case; etc.

The conspiracy was initiated in 1978 by Steven Weinberg, Shelly Glashow and Sidney Coleman at the Lyman Laboratory of Physics at Harvard University and by Herman Feshback at MIT. Santilli was invited by the Department of "Energy" to initiate studies of irreversibility via his pioneering papers on Lie-admissible theories because it was needed for a serious study of all "energy" releasing processes. These studies clearly implied a structural broadening of Einstein's theories since, as indicated, the latter are strictly reversible over time. Weinberg-Glashow-Coleman strongly opposed the will of the United States Government, and publicly declared "Santilli studies have no physical value." To understand the dimension of the conspiracy, one should know that tidies on Santilli's irreversible Lie-admissible formulations remain prohibited in academia in all developed countries, although conducted in silence in corporations because essential for the study of energy releasing processes.

As part of his studies of irreversibility, Santilli needed to achieve a representation of nuclear magnetic moments (that was and is still missing) via Fermi's hypothesis that nucleons are deformed by nuclear strong interactions with consequential deformation of their intrinsic magnetic moments. The study of this historical hypothesis implied a structural generalization of the heart of Einstein special relativity, the symmetry under rotation (that Santilli achieved via his Lear-isotopic and Lie-admissible theories). Feshback and his group at MIT strongly opposed such a generalization with rather "theatrical acts" [1]. For instance, thanks to the international cooperation by members of the indicated organized interests, Feshback managed to prohibit H. Rauch from Austria (a leader in neutron interferometry) to access his laboratory at the University of Grenoble, France, in order to verify his initial announcement of deformability of nucleon under strong interactions. To understand the power of the indicated organized interests on Einstein, one should know that the experimental confirmation of Fermi's historical hypothesis on the deformability of nucleons has remained prohibited to this day in all universities of developed countries, except for manipulated tests without exposure of nucleons to strong interactions. The demonstrability of nucleons via Santilli's Lie-isotopic and Lie-admissible theories is silently studied in corporate conduits by achieving the first and only known exact representation of nuclear magnetic moments so essential for new clean energies that are much needed by mankind, yet strongly opposed by organized interests on Einstein.

After Santilli left Harvard (somewhat disgusted) in 1983, the obstructions by Weinberg-Hogwash-Coleman-Feshback-et al their world wide organization against Santilli as a person and against his research were multiplied. Prior to this conspiracy, Santilli had regularly published papers in journals of the American, Italian and British physical society. In 1984, these societies received "orders" from said organization to prohibit the publication of any additional papers by Santilli, and so it was and it is the case to this day [2] 2008 update of "Il Grande Grido" see Santilli selected papers in the references. Renato Angelo Ricci, then a disgraceful President of the Italian Physical Society, put it in writing: "Santilli, your papers cannot be published in our journals because they are opposed by your colleagues at Harvard" Santilli was also the victim of truly unbelievable vexation, such as the prohibition for him to attend a meeting on his most important creation, hadronic mechanics, organized by said interests at the University of Southern Iowa at Cedar Falls under public U. S. financial support. Quite distressing for me, as a U. S. Citizen, to see the documentation of the prohibition for Santilli to attend any physics meeting organized in the U.S.A with public funds, such as meetings at FERMILAB, SLAC, or national laboratories and see numerous act of "scientific bandits" [2].

At the advent of the internet era, Sidney Coleman and Herman Feshback had died, and Steven Weinberg could only operate in the shadow due to his known illiteracy on this new technology. Hence, the torch of the international, organized conspiracy against Santilli passed to Arthur Rubin, David Epstein and Mark Bernstein, the controllers of Santilli's "Article" at Wikipedia. According to an Investigative Agency hired by the International Committee on Scientific Ethics and Accountability (ICSEAA) Rubin-Epstein-Weinstein and their world wide associates perpetrated truly incredible acts of scientific gangsterism, such as: commissioning the journalist member of their group Carrie Weimar to write a negative profile on Santilli, which she did (see said Article); commissioning the "engineer" J. M. Calo at Brown University, RI, another notorious member of said interests to write a paper of strong criticism on Santilli's post Ph. D. discovery in "chemistry" of the new chemical special of magnecules, who, of course, did it as requested; use the unfortunate credibility the negative depiction of Santilli in Wikipedia, obstructed Santilli technical presentation at NASA in the use of his new species to improve safety and trust for aerospace rosiest; and perpetrated additional true acts of "scientific banditism"; requested the organizers of the 2014 International Conference by the American Institute of Applied Sciences held in Madrid, Spain http://aimsciences.org/conferences/2014/index.html To close the already organized session on Santilli's Isodifferential Calculus and Lie Santilli theory with ensuing investigation initiated by the organizers (Carla Santilli and other participants can provide affidavit of the case); and did additional true acts of "scientific banditism" hardly credible for their protracted impunity.

Santilli's lawsuit against Frank Install (head of the Dutch Skeptic Society), his employee Pepijin van Erp et al. from The Netherlands provides the final evidence of the international, organized conspiracy by "academic, financial and ethnic interests on Einstein's theories" against Santilli's mathematical, theoretical and experimental research beyond Einstein. The main issue for the USA is: How long should the academic, financial and ethnic interests on Einstein" should be allowed to continue their unethical control of science under the misuse of billions of taxpayers dollars. Zew75oy

Post 5.
I was a graduate student in physics at Harvard at the time when Professor Santilli was there and I remember very well when in early 1978 he presenetd to the faculty there the research on irreversibility under his DOE grant. I remeber that well becasue I was interested in the field, due to its novelty and application to energies, and actually started to do research in it, but I had to stop to survive in academia due to the reasons so eloquently explained by the Editorial team of Harvard's Crimson The Politics of Science

Santilli first presenetd to Steven Weinberg, Shelly Glashow and Sydney Coleman the main need for his studies on irreversibility, namely, their need for quantitative studies on all energy releasing processes; he then showed the origin of the reversibility over time of Einstein's special relativity and quantum mechanics, such as the invariance of the Lie product under anti-Hermiticity [A,B] = - [A, B]; and finally showed the historical initiation of studies on irreversibility by Lagrange and Hamilton via the external terms in their celebrated equations. The later point was illustrated with the "vignetta" ("little sketch" in Italian) one can see in page 189 of Il Grande Grido - Ethical Problem of Einstein followers in the U.S.A: An Insider's View,


I remember that Weinberg, Glashow and Coleman were visibly unhappy at this presentation and indeed they later on stated to everybody, including to Santilli's graduate students, that "Santilli studies have no physical value." During the same session, Santilli also represented the "vignetta" (see page 190 of Il Grande Grido)

showing the "universality" of his Lie-admissible formulations, since Lie-admissible algebras in Santilli's form with product (A, B) - ARB - BSA is the most general known algebra with a bi-linear product over a field of characteristic zero, thus including as particular cases all known algebras. This universality made Weinberg, Glashow and Coleman even more nervous.... The rest is described and documented in Il Grande Grido. Xwe76to

Post 6.
One of the mosy dishonest claims by "organzied academic, financial and ethnic interests on Einstein" against Santilli is that he only published in his Journal, the Hadronic Journal. Therefore, out of the 325+ papers and 30 post Ph. D. monographs in physics and chemistry available from his Public Pleadings, I selected the following representative papers poublished in journals of the American, Italian, British Physical Societies and other refereed journals around the world. Gew40yp. Note that, before joining the faculty of Harvard University, Santilli was obviously publishing in journals of various physical societies, but after leaving Harvard these poublications were prohibited and he published his paper in other refereed journals around the world. Ter23qw

PAPERS PUBLISHED IN PHYSICAL REVIEW
OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY
Phys. Rev. D Vol. 20, 555-570 (1979)
Phys. Rev. D Vol. 1, 2753-2765 (1970)
Phys. Rev. D Vol. 7, 2447-2456 (1973)
Phys. Rev. D Vol. 10, 3396-3406 (1974)
Phys. Rev. D Vol. 22, 892?907 (1980)

PAPERS PUBLISHED IN IL NUOVO CIMENTO
OF THE ITALIAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY
Supplemento al Nuovo Cimento 6, 1225-1249 (1968)
Meccanica Vol. 1, 3-11 (1969)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 44, 1284-1289 (1966)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 51, 89-107 (1967)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 51, 748 (1967)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 51, 570-576 (1967)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 55B, 578-586 (1968)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 56B, 323-326 (1968)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 6, 1225-1249 (1968)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 2, 449-455 (1969)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 5, 551-590 (1971)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 2, 965-1015 (1971)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 12, 185-204 (1972)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 33, 145-153 (1982)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 37, 545-555 (1983)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 37, 337-344 (1983)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 37, 509-521 (1983)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 37, 505-508 (1983)

PAPERS PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL OF THE
BRITISH INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS
Journal of Physics Vol. 1, 1-26 (1995)
J. Moscow Phys. Soc. Vol. 3, 255-280 (1993)

PAPERS PUBLISHED IN OTHER REFEREED JOURNALS
International Journal of Physics Vol. 1, 1-26 (1995)
Balkan Journal of Geometry and its Applications, Vol. 1, pp. 61-73 (1996)
Journal of Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories, Vol. 1, 121-193 (2003)
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 31, pages 1113 1128 (2006)
The Open Astronomy Journal Vol. 3, pages 126-144, 2010
Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 12, pages 165-188 (2012)
Italian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 31, pages 239-254 (2013)
Journal of computational methods in sciences and engineering (JCMSE), 13 (2013) 37-50
Italian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Vol. 31, pages 239-254 (2013)
Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering Vol. 14, pp 405-415 (2014)
American Journal of Modern Physics, Vol. 4, pp 5-9, (2015)
American Journal of Modern Physics Vol. 4, p. 15-18 (2015)
American Journal of Modern Physics Vol. 4, pages 26-43, (2015)
American Journal of Modern Physics Vol. 4(5), pages 59-75 (2015)
American Journal of Modern Physics Vol. 4, No. 5, (2015)
Ameriucan Journal of Modern Physiucs, Vol. Vol. 5, issue 2, p. 56 (2016)
American Journal of Modern Physivcs Vol. 4, issue 2, p. 185 (2016)
American Journal of Modwern Physics Vol. 5, No. 2-1, (2016)
American Journal of Modern POhysics Vol. 5, No. 2-1, (2016)
American Journal of Modern Physics 2017; 6(4-1): 29-45
\ American Journal of Modern Physics 2017; 6(4-1): 46-52
American Journal of Modern Physics, Vol. 6(4-1), page 85-104 (2017)
American Journal of Modern Physics 2017; 6(4-1): 105-109
American Journal of Modern Physics 2016; 5(2-1): 56-118
Hyperfine Interactions Vol. 109, pp. 63-81 (1997)
Int. J. Theor. Phys. Vol. 2, 201-211 (1969)
J. Theor. Phys. Vol. 3, 233-241 (1970)
J. Math. Phys. Vol. 11, 2297-2301 (1970)
Annals of Physics Vol. 83, 108-157 (1974)
Physics Essays Vol. 5, 44-46 (1992)
J. Phys. G: Nucl & Part. Phys. Vol. 18, L61-L65 (1992)
J. Phys. G: Nucl. & Part. Phys., Vol. 18, L141-L146 (1992)
J. Moscow Phys. Soc. Vol. 3, 255-280 (1993)
JINR Rapid Comm. Vol. 6, 24-38 (1993)
L. De Brfoglie Vol. 18, pp. 71-389 (1993)
Comm. Theor. Phys. Vol. 3, 47-66 (1994)
Comm. Theor. Phys. Vol. 3, 153-181 (1994)
Chinese J. Syst. Eng. & Electr. Vol. 6, 157-176 (1995)
Intern. J. Quantum Chem. Vol. 26, 175-187 (1995)
Chine J. Syst. Eng. & Electr. Vol. 6, 177-199 (1995)
Revista Tecnica Vol. 18, 271-284 (1995)
Comm. Theor. Phys. Vol. 4, (1995)
Indian J. Mathematics Vol. 37, 235-256 (1995)
World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 369-383 (1996)
World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 500-505 (1996)
Anale Stintifice Universitatii Ovidius Constanta Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 113-126 (1996)
Rendiconti Circolo Matematico Palermo, Suppl. Vol. 42, pp. 7-82 (1996)
Anale Stiintifice Univ. Al.I. Cuza, Matematica, Vol. XLII, pp. 121-72 (1996)
Balkan Journal of Geometry and its Applications, Vol. 1, pp. 61-73 (1996)
Revista Tecnica Univ. Zulia Vol. 19, 69-84 (1996)
Rev. Tec. Ingegn. Univ. Zulia Vol. 19, pp. 3-16 (1996)
Indian J. Math. Vol. 38, pp. 1-24 (1996)
Balkan Society of Geometers, Volume 1, pp. 83-94, Balkan Society of Geometers (1997)
World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 549-556 (1997)
Gravitation, Vol. 3, no. 2 (1997)
Foundations of Physics, vol. 27, 625-740 (1997)
Foundations of Physics Letters Vol. 10, 307-327 (1997)
Indian J. Mathematics Vol. 38, pp. 43-54 (1997)
Found. Phys. Letters Vol. 11, pp. 483-493 (1998)
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Vol. 50, pp. 167-175 (1998)
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Vol. 50, pp. 177-190 (1998)
Intern. J. of Phys. Vol. 4, pp. 1-70 (1998)
Modern Physics Letters Vol. 13, 327-335 (1998)
Int. J. Mod. Phys. D Vol. 7, 351-407 (1998)
Infinite Energy, Vol. 22, pp. 33-49 (1998)
Infinite Energy, Vol. 19, 72-78 (1998)
Intern. J. Modern Phys. A Vol. 14, pp. 3157-33206 (1999)
Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy Vol. 24, 943-956 (1999)
Communications in Math. and Theor. Phys. Vol. 2, 1-12 (1999)
Intern. J. Modern Phys. A Vol. 14, pp. 2205-2238 (1999)
Infinite Energy, Vol. 23, pp. 69-74 (1999)
Infinite Energy, Vol. 25, pp. 75-85 (1999)
Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy Vol. 25, pp. 173-183 (2000)
Nova Science Publishers, pp. 421-442 (2000)
Comm. Math. & Theor. Phys. Vol. 2, 1-66 (2001)
Foundation of Physics, Vol. 32, pages 1111-1140 (2002)
Journal of Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories, Vol. 1, 121-193 (2003)
Advances in Algebras, K. P. Shum et al. Editors, pages 185-220 (2003)
Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Volume 29 Hors s«erie 2, (2004)
Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Volume 29, pages 953-968 (2004)
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 31, pages 1113 1128 (2006)
IBR preprint TPH-03-05 (2005), galilean Electrodynamics Vol. 17, Special issue 3, pp. 42-54 (2006)
IBR preprint TPH-09-05 (2005), Journal Applied Sciences, in press (2006)
General Bibliography on Hadronic Mathematics, Mechanics and Chemistry (2008)
The Open Astronomy Journal Vol. 3, pages 126-144, 2010
New Advances in Physics, Vol. 4, pages 18-41 (2010)
Sankata Printing Press, Nepal (2011)
Italian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 31, pages 239-254 (2013)
Journal of computational methods in sciences and engineering (JCMSE), 13 (2013) 37-50
Italian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Vol. 31, pages 239-254 (2013)
Clifford Analysis, Clifford algebras and their applications." Vol. 3, 2014,pages 1-26
Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering Vol. 14, pp 405-415 (2014)
Clifford Analysis, Clifford Algebras and their Applications Vol. 3, pages 1-26, (2014)
Foundation of Chemistry, DOI 10.1007/s10698-015-9218-z (March 24, 2015)
Generalized Lie Theory and Applications Vol. 9, 230-235 (2015)
Clifford Algebras and their Applications (2017)
Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, March 8-10, 2010
Journal of Generalized Lie Theories, in pores (2017)

Post 7.
Hackers mask their location, so how does one know if the hackers were really located in Tel Aviv? Lre99pp

Post 8.
I believe that the originators of the clear, conspiracy that prompted the lawsuit, namely, Steven Weinberg, Shelly Glashow, Sidney Coleman, Herman Feshback, Arthur Rubin, David Epstein, Mark Bernstein, Joseph Calo, Frank Israel, Robert Brown, etc. and their affiliates in all physics departments around the world, are very dishonest and anti-American people without any sense of shame, just pure greed for their interests on Einstein. In fact, they have attacked for about half a century without any provocation via vulgar slander on personal scientific and industrial grounds a senior American scientist of the caliper of SIR Ruggero Maria Santilli ( Prof. R. M. Santilli Biographical Notes and the Full Curriculum)) for his "surpassing ofd Einstein at the mathematical, theoretical and experikmental levels while not being a member of their ring." Since the information is intentionally suppressed the Wikipedia Article" and in other sources, we proudly recall that, besides the long list of awards available in his Biographical notes, Prof. Santilli was knighted in September 2011 by the Republic of San Marino with the m membership in the millenary Equestrian Order of Sant'Agata (see the Documentation of Prof. santilli's Awards) Mnd34as

Post 9.
I hope and expect that your lawsuit will fail and that you will stop sending your spam emails to me and others. Aqq55oo

Post 10.
Yes, Aqq55oo, it is quite possible that the Santilli's will lose their lawsuit against Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp because in America there are no laws against defamation. However, you will not like to know that the filing per se has already proved the existence of a conspiracy by your ring against new advances beyond Einstein. Also, it will make you even more unhappy to know that irate investors of Santilli's technologies have offered money for the continuation of the lawsuit in Europe where there are indeed strict laws against defamation. Wd73ge

Post 11.
Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington of the U. S. Federal Court, Middle District of Florida, denied this afternoon, March 22, 2018, the motion to dismiss the defendant Frank Israel as well as the separate motion for dismiss of the entire lawsuit by defendant Pepin van Erp, see Docket 067 in the Public records

Post 12.
The Santilli should file a strong complain at the American Bar Association against the defendants' attorney James J. McGuire (601 South Boulevard, Tampa, Florida 33606) for unethical conduct because his public pleadings constitute serious slander against Prof R. M. Santilli since they contain defaming claims disputed by known evidence. Here is an example. At the international conference ICNPAA 2016, held at the University of La Rochelle, France, on July 4 to 9, 2016, Prof. Santilli delivered an invited plenary lecture on his mathematical, theoretical and industrial advances, not for the conditions conceived by Einstein (known as exterior problems of point particles in vacuum), but for conditions beyond those known at Einstein;'s time (known as interior problems of extended particles within physical media), see the scientific paper on the lecture

R. M. Santilli "An introduction to the new sciences for a new era," Invited paper, SIPS 2016, Hainan Island, China Clifford Analysis, Clifford Algebras and their Applications (Cambridge, UK), Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 1-119, 2017
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/new-sciences-new-era.pdf

Following the predictable success of this plenary lecture due, Prof. Santilli received during the banquet of the conference the following Scientific Award which, as one can see, is signed by all three organizers

Due to its importance and academic origin, this award proved the vicious character of the slanderous attacks against Prof., Santilli by the organized international conspiracy against the :surpassing of Einstein's theories clearly established by this lawsuit and by preceding posts. In order to implement the mandate received from Arthur Rubin, David Ep[stein and Mark Bernstein (editor of the slanderous Wikipedia "Article" on Prof. Santilli, see preceding posts) the defendant Frank Israel published in the Website of the Dutch Skeptic Society
the following vicious statement against Prof. Santilli.

Shenanegans by Ruggero Santilli: - "To most people it will be clear that this award was instigated by Mr. S. himself and that he just asked his co-worker Georgiev to organize the signatures. There is a clue that this piece of paper was doctored at the offices of Mr. S.: the filename of the picture is 'TARPON_2.jpg', which points to the address of his business (1444 Rainville Road, Tarpon Springs, Florida). I'm sure that these are just two more events we can add to the long list of fringe activities on Santilli's curriculum vitae."

which statement was then reproduced by the paid mercenary in scientific crimes, the defendant Pepijn van Erp in his defaming websites in English, French, German and Italian (See the list ion Post 2) and used in its integrity by attorney McGuire in its public pleading (see Docket 064). The problem for Israel, van Erp, Rubin, Epstein, Bernstein, McGuire and their affiliates is that, per public knowledge in the Website of the 2016 ICNPAA Conference, the News of the R. M. Santilli Foundation, and other public releases, the Scientific Award was granted to Prof. Santilli (and other distinguished scientists) during the banquet of the meeting under the presence of all three organizers, as documented by the following pictures and numerous other by the participants

The manifest impossibility for Prof. santilli to fake his La Rochelle Scientific Award and show it in the presence of the organizers establishes the violation of the Ethical Rules of the American Bar Association by attorney James J. McGuire for which he should be kept accountable. The remaining public pleadings by McGuire are full of similar reproductions of defaming claims by the defendants without any documentary support, thus confirming the intentional slander of Prof. Santilli, and ensuing unethical conduct.

As an additional evidence of the existence of the "international, organized, scientific crime on Einstein," one should know that, per their admission, Frank Israel and Pepijn van Erp asked assistance to discredit Prof. Santilli's Scientific Award to Robert Brown, then president of the American Institute of Physics (AIP), who in turn requested in writing to the organizers of the La Rochelle conference the removal of the AIP name in the list of sponsors -specifically and solely 0- for Prof. Santilli scientific award, which request was flatly denied by the organizers. How long can America survive as an advanced technological civilization under the one century old dominance of this "organized scientific crime on Einstein"? Prof. and Mrs. Santilli have been the sole Americans to date who had the courage of confronting this "organized scientific crime" to serve America against their own interests. How about you, reader? Are you a member of this "organized scientific crime on Einstein" or an accomplice by silence? Please disprove this gloomy scenario and express your views. Zwe290ys

Post 13.
I wonder who is footing the substantial costs of a lawsuit in the U. S. Federal Court since Israel and van Erp are known to be little people with limited income? Bse22ytu

Post 14.
I heard that the defendants bills are paid by a certain attorney Kim White from California in apparent support of the First Amendment of the U. S. Constitution.

Post 15.
It appears that White's brain is not clicking wright since the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitutions solely applies to U.S. citizens. The defendants are European citizens under strict European laws prohibiting slander and defamation that are smply non-existing in the U.S.A..

Post 16.
I heard that White is merely channeling to McGuire US taxpayer money secured via a fake appointment of Israel as part of an NSF research grant. I wonder whether somebody can check this out. Lre88as

Post 17.
But then, who is footing the bills for the Santillis?Bdsd23ui

Apparently, a N. Y. investor who has been really p... op... by Israel and van Erp for his substantial losses in stock (see Post 2) has offered to the Santillis all necessary funds to continue the lawsuit in Europe. I assume the Santillis are footing the bills for the lawsuit in U. S. Federal Court. Cwe70mn

Post 18.
In the event confirmed, I would be outraged at the fact that American money is used to foot the bills for foreigners to interfere in our lives in the vicious way documented in Post 12. Zwe57io

Post 19.
I very seriously doubt that Santilli has been the only scientist to feel the wrath of the organized interests on Einstein's theories, because the list is extremely long, Here are the better known cases.
Fritz Zwicky,
The Swiss author of the 1929 hypothesis of Tired Light, was fiercely attacked by the German speaking members of the organization because his hypothesis implied the possibility of changing the frequency of light during flight - which is in gross violation of Einsteins special relativity. There are even rumors in Europe that his better-half was also under attack by other wives from the organization. Under such combined pressure, he caved in a condition to remain in academia at the time (1930's) and dismissed his hypothesis of tired light, although he died without accepting the hyperbola of the expansion of the universe.
Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons
The authors of the 1990 tentative and well presented announcement of apparent nuclear fusions at ambient temperature, were accused of "fraud" at CNN by Herman Feshback the morning after their cautious scientific announcement, the reason being were said fusions were known to violate Einstein's special relativity and quantum mechanics (relativistic quantum mechanics). The attacks were so extreme and prejudiced that both Englishman and Pons were forced to leave America and move to Germany where they continued their study.
Halton Arp,
The experimental astrophysicist at Harvard University, who discovered quasars physically attached to galaxies while their respective cosmological redshifts are dramatically different. He was approached by Irving Shapiro, Sidney Coleman and other physicist at Harvard who requested him to publish a paper of dismissal of his discovery because Arps' pair are clear experiments of verification of the lack of expansion of the universe, with consequential lack of validity in cosmology of Einstein special relativity. Arp refused to comply and, even though he was the recipient of a substantial governmental grant, he was unable to locate an academic position anywhere in the US, thus being forced to move with his family to Germany where he continued his studies. To really understand the capillary character and criminal intent of the organization, one should know that Arp was refused access to any astrophysics laboratory anywhere in the world.
Eugene Mallove,
A physicist who left MIT because of apparent fraud in the local repetition of the experiment by Fleishmann and Pons, created the magazine Infinite Energy, and conducted a relentless attack for ethical misconduct in the MIT Physics department. Mallove was murdered in 2004 under very mysterious circumstances. The person that has been accused as the originator of the murder, continues his claim to be innocent (of course) and both the judge and the prosecutors have been identified as members of the organization.
Ruggero Maria Santilli,
An Italian-American physicist who conducted a traditional academic lift by publishing in the journals of various physical societies, until he landed a position at Harvard University under DOE support with the the request of developing quantitative treatment of irreversible processes, for the first time ever, including most importantly, all energy releasing forms. Santilli felt immediately the wart of the organization at Harvard that kept him without a salary from his own grant for an entire year, even though he had a family with two young children to attend and barely managed to survive with unemployment benefits. The rest of the study is reviewed in Post 2 of this blog. The problem for the organization is that, unlike preceding dissident physicists, Santilli loved America too much and decided to stay. This was extremely disturbing for the organization that, continuously increased the attacks against Santilli to inexaplicable extremes of human and scientific misconduct that eventually lead to this lawsuit. To really understand the criminal conduct and character of the organization one should know that, in view of his continuation of research beyond Einstein, Santilli has been the victim of various life threats for decades, see for instance the denunciation released by Santilli's supporters following the vicious attacks reported in Post 12 Documentation of life threats to Prof. Santilli which threats have been periodically reported to the FBI. So santilli is life his life with CIA type of recording equipment in his dress and car., all this happening in the United States of America while members of the organization are praised and hailed at all levels of society. What an evil and anti-American support! Fwqw40yu

Post 20.
Is there any way to stop this feud between Santilli an "organized interests on Eoinstein"? Caw11pp

Post 20.
Caw11pp, the resolution of the feud you indicate is quite simple: organized interests on Einstein should stop attacking Santilli. Then he would have no reason to respond, and he never initiated attacks in any case. Gre24uo

Post 20.
I visited Harvard in 1978 as a prospective incoming physics graduate student, where I met with Shelly Glashow and Sidney Coleman. I was later to work with Steve Weinberg as a graduate student. I am not at all surprised by these reports of their poor behavior. My impression of both Glashow and Weinberg is that they were socially immature, and arrogant. I was personally bullied by them to differing degrees. I felt these two were politically unsophisticated, but I suspect claims of behaviors of this kind are much more likely to have originated with John A. Wheeler, a mentor of Weinberg's, and of whose background, motivations, and means I am well acquainted. John Wheeler was a savvy, effective political operative who managed departments, politics and money. Wheeler's reputation hinged entirely on Einstein's relativity, and Wheeler knew how to cover his own tracks. Compared to the political sophistication of Dr. Wheeler -- a close friend of Nixon and Kissinger - - Drs. W einberg and Glashow were naive agents. Qew36ou

Post 21.
Qew36ou should be praised for his dignity and courage, but his pPst 20 needs clarifications.The "immaturity" of Weinberg and Glashow can be cleaned solely when they deal with us "gentiles" (meaning "inferior" in Hebrew as thought since childhood in Synagogues). When dealing with their brothers, they were great! I remember vividly that, when I was at Harvard in the early 1980s dreaming for a physics position there, Weinberg, Glashow and Coleman provided an incredible organized support of Refuse-nick physicists from Russia under fake claim of persecution in their land. All these Refuse-nicks all find an academic job on arrival, while we American physicists were cut out. The discrimination again qualified American physicists reached truly offensive overtones with of seminars at Harvard from these Refuse-nicks. I attended one of them and was shocked to see local physicists strongly applauding statements by these speakers that, for a seminar at Harvard, are like 2 + 2 = 4. The applauses were then used for confirming the pre-set academic jobs, I though I was having a nightmare, but the organized nation-wide discrimination of highly qualified American scientists in favor of semi- illiterate Refuse-nicks grew to the point that I left Harvard in a state of great disappointment and revulsion. Bq[-2rt

Post 22.
From Post 2: "The vicious attacks in corporate blogs by Frank Israel and Pepijin (sic) van Erp have been so organized, relentless and vulgar to cause millions of dollars of losses in the value of the stock owned by tens of thousands of stockholders (see the sworn Affidavits of corporate officers in the attachments of indicated first filing)" I have examined the filing and attachments. No such Affadavit(s), sworn or otherwise, exist. Vsa45uo, please explain this inconsistency. Mmm33tt

Post 23.
Hello , the motion with the two Affidavits I indicated at the end is at the top of the list of public documents,
http://www.galileoprincipia.org/Lawsuit-against-Frank-Israel-and-Pepijn-van-Erp/0%20Doc.%20064%20P%20Motion%20Preliminary%20Injunction%20.pdf
I am told that the two executives have already been interrogated by the defendant attorneys and provided evidence of large financial losses caused to thousands of stockholders of two U. S. public companies by Frank Israel and his associates. I understand hat particular emphasis has emerged on the fact that we are dealing with foreigners causing the assassination of undesired research in the United States of America. Vsa45uo

Post 24.
I believe that the slanderous attacks of Santilli's research by Frank Israel and his associates of the Dutch Skeptic Society, done via illegal SEO techniques assuring their appearance at the top under Google searches, constitute one of the darkest moments of science for the evident reason that said attacks have propagated throughout the scientific community, by therefore assassinating at birth any desire to pursue basically new scientific knowledge. The dishonesty by Frank Israel and his associates is easily proved by the fact that, for instance, they supports the search for dark matter and dark energy even though considered fake sciences (see Section III.4 and III.5 of Debate on Cosmology) because they are compatible with Einstein theories, while they attack as fraud Santilli's search for antimatter galaxies because violating said theories. This gloomy scenario is reinforced by evidence apparently gathered by an investigative agency according to which Frank Israel and his Skeptic Society acted under a mandate from Arthur Rubin, David Epstein, and Mark Bernstein at Wikipedia-Google complex in support of their slanderous "Article" on Santilli to prevent the acceptance of his broadening of Einstein theories. As it was the case for the Roman Empire, I fear that the United States of America have lost their world leadership at its peak because Americans have permitted the "organized cartel on Einstein and its liberal associates to achieve control of academia, news media, the U. S. President (including President Trump of lately), The U. S. Congress, the Federal Reserve and the Nobel Foundation. Said control is then used for dictatorial, anti-American aims against the hosting society, as it happened five centuries ago in Spain, one century ago in Germany, ago, in the U.S.A with the Manhattan Project that resulted in the biggest blunder of the judicial systems because the messengers of the treason (the Rosenberggs) were caught, convicted, prosecuted and executed, but the real perpetrators of the passing the atomic bomb secrets to their brothers in Russia (the physicists of the Manhattan Project) were never prosecuted !, Ruggero and Carla Santilli have been the sole Americans I know to date who have opposed the conduction of science by the organized cartel on Einstein via slander and defamation. Other Americans in academia and elsewhere, have supinely accepted the systematic assassination of scientific democracy either because of illusory gains, or because of complicity via silence. But then, it is written in history that people have the institutions they want or deserve. Nds23io

Post 25.
I understand that the Santillis have been deposed. Can anybody report the outcome? I am particularly interested to knwo possible evidence of this blatant conspiracy against them. Bds23yo

Post 26.
Bds23yo (Post w6), we are trying to secure the public pleadings of the case. The Editorial Board (5.-5-18)<\p><\p>

Post 27.
Plaintiff's motion for temporary injunction of Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp
http://www.galileoprincipia.org/Lawsuit-against-Frank-Israel-and-Pepijn-van-Erp/0%20Doc.%20064%20P%20Motion%20Preliminary%20Injunction%20.pdf
U. S. Magistrate Mark A. Pizzo allows foreign slander of U. S. research for National Security
http://www.galileoprincipia.org/Lawsuit-against-Frank-Israel-and-Pepijn-van-Erp/Doc. 071 Report & Recommendation Deny Mtn Injunction.pdf
Objections by Prof. and Mrs. Santilli's attorney Joseph Parrish
http://www.galileoprincipia.org/Lawsuit-against-Frank-Israel-and-Pepijn-van-Erp/Doc. 072 P Objection to R&R.pdf
Judge V. M. H. Covington's adoption oc Magistrate Pizzo recommendation
http://www.galileoprincipia.org/Lawsuit-against-Frank-Israel-and-Pepijn-van-Erp/Doc. 074 Order Granting R&R and Denying P Mtn for Injunction .pdf
Awe87we (5-11-18)

Post 28.
Chapeau to the Santillli's for fighting the good fight against the abuse of the First Amendment of the US Constitution by a blogger! After reading carefully all the documents, it seems that a bogger from the Netherlands is allowed to damage the business of a scientist from Florida who has created two publicly traded companies that are benefitting the economy of Florida and giving jobs to many Florida families. Question:What have Pepijn van Erp and Frank Israel done for us? War67ort

Post 29.
Who cares about the scientifically illiterate Pepijin van Erp who, at 46 years of age, has been unable to complete his degree and writes about Crop Circles, Coriolis Effect in Uganda, Pigs Diarrhea and calls himself a member of the Skeptics. In my book Skeptics (with capital S) are Michael Sherman, John Horgan and those who have the intellect and the education to debate issues that have merit in society and stimulate discussion and questions about important themes. Frank Israel is in the same league of our lying blogger Pepijn when as chairman of the Sticking Skepsis hides behind the English website of Pepijn van . Vsd34ap

Post 30.
Post 25/Post 25, what "conspiracy" are you mumbling about? I see none. Daw22oo

Post 31.
Lre88as/Post 15 states "The defendants are European citizens under strict European laws prohibiting slander and defamation that are simply non-existing in the U.S.A." (Post 15) Irrelevant. The suit is being brought in the US, and US laws and standards apply. Why would you think or suggest otherwise? Feo22vb

Post 32.
Feo22vb/Post 31 is daydreaming like most of his friends and could not care less for scientific democracy for qualified inquiries in the U.S.A. and only care for their asocial ethnic interests. Prof.. and Mrs. Santilli are also EC Citizens, have already selected a strong European Law ffirm, and are in the process of filing additional legal action against the paid mercenaries Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp, this time, for CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS EUROPEAN LAWS. Swe92gf

Post 33.
Lre88as/Post 30 has doubts on the existence of the conspiracy against Prof. Santilli. But then we should have a record in this blog that Wikipedia commissioned Pepijn van Erp the article against Santilli, starting with HHO saying that he was promoting "water fueled cars" then it went on to Calo's fake article about magnecules ( there is now a US patent on those) and Pepijin van Erp was rewarded with an article on Wikipedia about himself, promoted by another Dutch page controller. At the same time Rubinstein, Epstein and Bernstein, the controllers of Santilli's article in Wikipedia , not happy because Santilli's technology was being commercialized decided to increase the pressure and Pepijn added other slander to the web, obtaining the permission to link his blog website to Wikipedia. Now magistrate Pizzo reads about Santilli in Wikipedia and the loop is closed! If this is not conspiracy, what is it? Forgot: wikipedia and its gang are also paying the attorneys of Pepijn van Erp and Frank Israel. Cse40-gp

Post 33.
Lre88as/Post 30 fakes lack of organized conspiracy against Prof. santilli. In response because of his surpassing of Einstein theories at the mathematical, scientific, and industrial levels. Here is a partial list of people who have organized decades of completely unprovoked slander and defamation of Prof. Santilli discoveries without any technical criticism published in refigured journals for the clear intent ofd exploiting society for immoral ethnic aims against America and mankind:
CAMBRIDGE, MA\ \Steven Weinberg
Sheldon Glashow
Sidney Coleman
Irwing Shapiro
Herman Feshback
Robert Oppenheim
Etc.
WIKIPEDIA
Arthur Rubin
David Epstein
Mark Bernstein
Carrie Weimar
Joseph <. Calo
T Frank Israel
etc.
AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS
Robert Brown
Etc.
As one can see, they are all Jews. In the event this is not enough for Lre88as/Post 30 to prove the point despite its documentation all the way to a lawsuit in federal Court, we will gladly provide names of several additional with a documentation of their individual misconduct as well as of their coordination, plus a report from a specialized Investigative Agency in academic corruption. csd23pu

Post 34.
released appeared on May 16, 2018, in the PRWEB NEWSWIRE
http://www.briefingwire.com/pr/foreign-slander-of-research-for-national-security-under-public-support-allowed-by-us-federal-court

Foreign Slander of Advanced Research for National Security Under Public Financial Support Allowed by U. S. Federal Court

Palm Harbor, Florida, May 16, 2018. The U. S. scientist Ruggero M. Santilli and his wife Carla Santilli have filed in the U. S. Federal Court, the Middle District of Tampa, a lawsuit against Frank Israel, Pepijn van Erp et al, from The Netherlands, for years of unprovoked, slander and defamation, at the personal, scientific and industrial levels,

Prof. Santilli's defamed new technologies have direct relevance for our National Security. The technologies were initiated in the early 1980's when Prof. Santilli was a member of the Department of Mathematics of Harvard University under DOE support, continued from 2007 to 2014 under support by a U. S. company publicly traded at NASDAQ with the symbol MNGA and, then supported from 2013 on by another U. S. publicly traded company under the symbol TNRG. The origin of the defamation is that said new technologies surpass Einstein's theories at the mathematical, scientific, and industrial levels, thus being strongly opposed by "organized academic financial and ethnic interests on Einstein" .

On March 16, 2018, the plaintiff's attorney Joseph Parrish filed a Motion for Temporary Injunction essentially requesting the temporary removal of the name "Santilli" in the URL of the defaming websites. On April 4, 2018, the U. S. Federal Magistrate Mark A. Pizzo filed his Recommendations to the Judge supporting the action by Pepijin van Erp Erp on grounds of the First Amendment. On May 4, 2018, the plaintiff's attorney Joseph Parrish filed a very strong Objection against Magistrate Pizzo Recommendations. On May 9, 2018, the U. S. Federal Judge Virginia M. H. Covington ruled her Acceptance of Magistrate Pizzo's Recommendations . The plaintiffs Prof. and Mrs. Santilli have respected Judge Covington's decision and, in fact, they have decided not to appeal, while preparing to file a new lawsuit in Europe under their joint European Citizenship where the slander and defamation by Pepijn van Erp and Frank Israel constitute violations of criminal laws. For full details, visit the release Foreign Slander of Advanced Research for National Security Under Public Financial Support Allowed by U. S. Federal Court,

The Staff of
The R. M. Santilli Foundation

Post 35.
This release appeared on Mat 16, 2018 in the website
http://scientificethics.org/foreign-slander-0f-national-security.php

Tarpon Springs, Florida, May 15, 2018

Foreign Slander of Advanced Research for National Security Under Public Financial Support Allowed by U. S. Federal Court

Palm Harbor, Florida, May 16, 2018. The U. S. scientist Ruggero M. Santilli and his wife Carla Santilli have filed in the U. S. federal Court, the Middle District of Tampa, a lawsuit against Frank Israel, Pepijn van Erp et al, from The Netherlands, for years of unprovoked, slander and defamation at the personal, scientific and industrial levels of Prof. Santilli's new technologies first initiated in the early 1980's when he was a member of the Department of Mathematics of Harvard University under DOE support, continued from 2007 to 2014 under support by a U. S. company publicly traded at NASDAQ with the symbol MNGA and, then supported from 2013 on by another U. S. publicly traded company under the symbol TNRG.

Prof. Santilli's slandered technologies are of direct relevance for the improvement of our National Security, including: 1) The discovery of new industrial means for the production on demand of neutrons synthesized from the hydrogen gas; known as Directional Neutron Source (DNS); 2) The application at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency of the Department of Defense for the construction of three Nuclear Weapon Detection Stations, one for our Military, one for Israel and one for continued laboratory tests; and cutting edge basically novel military applications; 3) The discovery of a new optical instrument, known as the Santilli telescope, which has initiated the search for antimatter galaxies alongside the search for dark matter and dark energy, as well as detected unknown entities that are invisible to the human eye and to Galileo-type viewers while hovering over civilian, industrial and military installation; and other basically novel military applications.

The above unprovoked, relentless and systematic attacks are the last of a century-old series of attacks for control of science by "organized academic financial and ethnic interests on Einstein" via slander, defamation, life threats as well as alleged murder against any scientist who dared to surpass Einstein while not being a member of the ring, as it is the case for Prof. Santilli's new technologies. The attacks are complemented with the dubbing of "antisemitism" that, when used to opposed scientific research, is an exploitation of the tragic Jewish people history for unethical aim against mankind. The attacks see their organized climax in Wikipedia, whose manipulated scientific positions requires the discreditation of qualified dissident view. According to an Investigative agency, as well as to Wikipedia archives, Arthur Rubin, David Epstein, Mark Bernstein and their associate controllers of Prof. Santilli's "Article" have organized all criticisms on Prof. Santilli's research quoted in that article while opposing the quotation of qualified confirmatory papers published at high level refereed journals; have commissioned their friend Frank Israel and Pepijn van Erp to implement a massive campaign of defamation in support of the content of said "Article" and are paying the cost of the ongoing lawsuits via California members of their ring.

As a further illustration of the fact that Wikipedia is the darkest shadow on the otherwise beautiful history of American science, we should note that Wikipedia controllers Arthur Rubin, David Epstein and Mark Bernstein commissioned the "engineer" Joseph P. Calo of Brown University to write a slanderous paper of non-technical criticisms of Santilli magnecules that caused untold financial damaged to the stockholders of the NASDAQ company MNGA developing the new chemical species. The dishonesty of Arthur Rubin, David Epstein and Mask Bernstein is then proved beyond "credible" doubt by the fact that they have systematically refused to quote Prof.Santilli U. S. patent on magnecules requiring a post Ph. D. knowledge in chemistry, for the evident reason that its listing would uncover their scheme against America in support of their sinister interests. In addition, in order achieve credibility of their scheme, Arthur Rubin, David Epstein and Mark Bernstein granted to the mercenary, scientifically illiterate blogger Pepijin van Erp a full "article" in Wikipedia in violation of the notability rule of Wikipedia itself, as stated by several contributors. Finally, it should be noted that, thanks to the necessary approval of their "friends" at Google, Arthur Rubin, David Epstein and Mark Bernstein have provided an anchor to Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp slanderous websites which anchor is the sole "credible" mean to assure that said websites appear immediately following Prof. Santilli's "Article" in Wikipedia years after years. The lawsuit here treated was eventually mandated by the latter Wikipedia-Google abuse.

The known reason for all these attacks is that Prof. Santilli's new technologies surpass Einstein at the mathematical, scientific, and industrial levels to treat new conditions simply unthinkable during Einstein's time, thus explaining the decades of relentless, organized obstructions on a world wide basis. By noting that there is no hope of securing any financial compensation from The Netherlands, Prof. and Mrs. Santilli have acted as True Americans by filing the lawsuit to attract attention on the fact that, following one century of ill-fated tolerance, "organized academic, financial and ethnic interest on Einstein" are now threatening the future of America in its most vital part, the development of new technologies, let alone threatening its National Security.

On March 16, 2018, the plaintiff's attorney Joseph Parrish filed a Motion for Temporary Injunction merely requesting the removal of the name "Santilli" in the URL of defaming websites on grounds that such a removal would not damage them. Besides waste documentation, the Motion also presented the sworn testimony by Scott Tadsen on the financial losses caused by Frank Israel and Pepijn van Erp to thousands of stockholder of the Nasdaq public-traded company, please see the sworn testimony by Scott Wainwright on the impossibility of funding under said barrage of slander, The OTC Markets public-traded company for the continued development of the above technologies of national relevance. On April 4, 2018, the U. S. Federal Magistrate Mark A. Pizzo filed his Recommendations to the Judge supporting the slander and defamation by Pepijin van Erp Erp on grounds of the First Amendment, while quoting a "scientist" a blogger who never started any graduate school, and ignoring fifty years of advanced research by Prof. Santilli at the highest institutions around the world including oblivion on his numerous awards, such as him Pro. Santilli being Knighted with the Title of Sir. On May 4, 2018, the plaintiff's attorney Joseph Parrish filed a very strong Objection against Magistrate Pizzo Recommendations. presenting a quite scholar distinction between the legitimate use of the First Amendment and the damage caused by its abuses to individual U. S. citizens as well as to America. On May 9, 2018, the U. S. Federal Judge Virginia M. H. Covington ruled her Acceptance of Magistrate Pizzo's Recommendations . The plaintiffs Prof. and Mrs. Santilli have respected Judge Covington's decision and, in fact, they have decided not to appeal, while preparing to file a new lawsuit in Europe under their joint European Citizenship where the slander and defamation by Pepijn van Erp and Frank Israel constitute violations of criminal laws.

Post 36.
Following the shocking Post 35, I did read Magistrate Pizzo's Recommendations to the Judge Virginia M. H. Covington and I found them astonishing because the CV is very prominent in the internet as well as the indication of Pepijn van Erp as a low rate blogger. . ..... Casd46pg

Post 37.
The ruling by Federal Judge Virginia M. H. Covington is totally legitimate and fully predictable. It appears that the Santilli did not understand the First Amendment of the U. S. Constitution. Daw22ii

Post 38.
Rulings by federal Judges should be respected. Yet, the denial by Judge Virginia M. H. Covington of Attorney Joseph Parrish motion for the "temporary" removal of the name "Santilli": in the defaming posts is questionable because such a temporary removal would clearly cause no hardship to Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp, while the damage to Santilli's technologies for our national security which are creating jobs in Florida is simply undeniable. It is also clear that these foreign defenders are abusing the First Amendment. Xda56wp

Post 39.
Lre88as/Post 30 mut be kidding. The incontrovertible evidence of the conspiracy against Prof. Santilli is that Arthur Rubin, David Epstein, Mark Bernstein are paying for the cost of foreign slander. Dsa35py/

?

Post 40.
Prof. R. M. Santilli has been knighted with the title of Sir on May 31, 2018, by the President of Italy Sergio Mattarella at a ceremony organized by the Miami Consolato Italianop http://www.santilli-foundation.org/santilli-knighted-by-italian-president.php. This is the second time Prof. Santilli is knighted with the title of Sir, the first time occurred on September 6, 2011, by the Republic of San Marino http://santilli-foundation.org/santilli-nobel-nominations.html What a difference with the U. S. Federal Magistrate Mark A. Pizzo and KJudge Virginia M. H. Covington who have allowed slander and defamation of Prof. Santilli's research despite its relevance for national security http://scientificethics.org/foreign-slander-0f-national-security.php

Post 41.
The case document list has become out of date. Items 77,78 and 79 have been produced. Item 77, attached, provides some remarkable details. This is a Motion to Dismiss by van Erp, and it references depositions by both Ruggero and Carla Santilli. RM Santilli's deposition was apparently pretty heroic, as page numbers quoted in the MTD run to nearly 300.

b nThe depositions themselves have not been released, and if the claims in the MTD are any indication such release will be fought tooth and nail by the plaintiffs. Since the depositions themselves are available to the court, it seems most unlikely that the claims in the MTD are other than factual representations of deposition statements. Under oath, the Santillis have apparently made the following admissions:

1) J.V. Kadeisvilli, rather than being a long-time collaborator whom Santilli met at Harvard, may or may not have existed. Certainly RM Santilli never met him in person (despite claims otherwise) or spoke to him on the telephone. Since, as van Erp has stated, many of Kadeisvilli's emails originated on Santilli's laptop, the likelihood of Kadeisvilli being anything other than a fabrication of Santilli seems remote.

2) The International Committee on Scientific Ethics and Accountability ( http://www.scientificethics.org), supposedly headed by Luca Petronio, was actually founded by Santilli, and the domain registration in the name of Petronio uses Santilli's cell phone number. While not definitive, this strongly suggests that Petronio is also a fictitious identity used by Santilli.

3) RM Santilli claims complete control of Thunder Energies. Thunder Energies has released at least one press release (http://www.prweb.com/releases/2015/01/prweb12448979.htm) under the byline of Pamela Fleming, who worked as a secretary for Santilli twenty years ago. Fleming was identified as Executive Vice President of Thunder Energies, despite not having worked for Santilli in over a decade..

4) Santilli published numerous articles in the American Journal of Modern Physics, published by the Science Publishing Group, despite Carla Santilli's statement that "Everybody has called [Science Publishing Group] a scam,". This does not reflect well on Santilli's claims to be a serious scientist.

5) Carla Santilli admitted to using false names to contribute to Wikipedia and to van Erp's blog.

With no way of knowing how many other damaging admissions Santilli made in deposition, any trial is likely to feature a major attack on Santilli's honesty and credibility.

EDITORIAL NOTE: The above message has been received via email at our e-address listed at the top of this website under the name of "James Martin"

Post 42.
Arthur Rubin and his ring[[ the Wiki editor of Santilli's "Article", alias "James Martin" ]] states (Post 41) With no way of knowing how many other damaging admissions Santilli made in deposition, any trial is likely to feature a major attack on Santilli's honesty and credibility. I am afraid Rubin is draydreaming. The reputation of a scientist is established by his scientific publications and not by the dishonest twistings by Rubin's attorney Lake, or by Rubin's paid mercenaries, Lying and Cheating of Pepijn van Erp and Frank Israel. The reality Rubin and his friends have to face is that the documentation in the ongoing lawsuit of forty years of unprovoked attacks against Santilli's science via slander and defamation without serious technical criticism, has justly damaged the credibility of the Jewish physics community. The trial in front of a jury is expected to provide the final evidence of the century old exploitation of science by organized Jewish interests to maintain Einstein's theories under conditions they do not belong. Ass54yp

Post 43.
The dispute underlying the lawsuit is rather clear. When he was in the faculty of Harvard University under DOE support, Santilli's studies confirmed the validity of Einstein's special relativity under the conditions stated by Einstein (point particles moving in empty space), but identified the "inapplicability" ("and not the violation" in his words) of special relativity under a number of broader conditions, including: extended and hyperdense protons and neutrons inside nuclei and stars; time irreversible nuclear reactions; energy releasing processes; and other conditions. This scientific evidence was sufficiently established in Santilli's 1984 book he wrote after leaving Harvard and scientific papers quoted therein, 2008 update of "Il Grande Grido" and confirmed beyond doubt in subsequent works, see Summary of Santilli's Works I must regrettably agree with Ass54yp (Post 42) to the effect that forty years of clearly organized opposition to these studies has seriously damaged the Jewish physics community because it is written in history that all theories are sooner or later surpassed by new theories, and this is the fate also for Einstein's theories. By keeping in mind the well known fact that Einstein's theories are fully reversible over time, particularly damaging to the Jewish physics community is the fact established by Santilli in the above quoted works that a suitable broadening of Einstein's theories for irreversible conditions is necessary for any consistent description of much needed new clean energies. As shown by by "James Martin," (Post 41) it is unfortunate for the Jewish physics community to have elected the continuation of opposition to basic advances via personal slander and attacks of a senior, highly qualified scientist, knighted twice by formal governmental institutions

Post 44.
Post 41 is made clearly by one of Pepijn Van Erp and Frank Israel group, or by one of those who are paying for their lawsuit. In fact the writer who says that is James Martin has learned pretty well their way of lying and deceiving. He says nothing of relevance or certainty, however leaves the readers with the impression that the Santilli's are deceitful and dishonest, but if one reads carefully, he says nothing that could be used against the Santilli in a court of law as he provides no proof, no certainty just allegation that cannot be proven. Gwe20tk

Post 45.
James Martin (Post 41), where is the meat of your attacks against Santilli? You state: "Carla Santilli admitted to using false names to contribute to Wikipedia and to Van Erp's blog." But everybody i uses an alias at Wikipedia. So, where is the meat besides your evident scheme and scam against a senior American scientist with such an unimpeachable reputation ? Zds40ty

Post 46.
Message: Now this is a question for James Martin: why do you do not give in your post the names of people who use their real name in the Pepijn van Erp's Blog, or in Wikipedia.? There are none of course, so why if Carla Santilli uses a pseudonym, you says that she uses FALSE ?names? To suggest that she is a false and dishonest person? If this is written in the MTD than it shows that the attorney of Pepijn and Israel has no better arguments and this proves my point! Lying and cheating !. Fwe39yu

Post 47
Jewish people are known to be very smart. Yet it escapes my comprehension the fact that they do not see the huge self-imposed damage they cause to themselves when using for their schemes paid mercenaries such as Lying and Cheating of Pepijn van Erp and Frank Israel. Zwi30yp

Post 48.
Message: So much for anonymity. Can you please update the other long messages (which must have also been received by email) to include the authors' names? Or does the stated "possibility of expressing comments in an anonymous way" only apply to Santilli supporters? This would not surprise me, but if it is the policy of this site it should be clearly stated. EDITORIAL NOTE: The name "James Martin" was released because it appeared to be an evident alias. In case we are wrong we apologize. No additional name will be released from future emails unless authorized, although full anonymity is assumed when using the mailbox.

Post 49.
Ass54yp - Your response is predicated on an entirely false premise. James Martin (me) has never met any person involved with the trial or Santilli's claims. Santilli and I were at MIT for one year in common, but I never met him. And while on the subject of false premises, you should reread the post. All of the claims are based directly on both Santilli's sworn statements. Given that Santilli is the plaintiff in this case, any response can hardly be called "unprovoked". Awe79io

Post 50.
Gwe20tk (Post 44) - says nothing that could be used against the Santilli in a court of law as he provides no proof, no certainty just allegation that cannot be proven." Really? Did you actually read what I wrote? All points are contained in defendant's Motion To Dismiss, and all points reference the Santillis' sworn testimony. Does Gwe20tk believe that the Santilli's testimony cannot be used in a court of law? Is repeating what the Santillis deposed baseless allegation? Very strange.Xwe90io Post $1)

Post 51.
James Martin (Posts 41 and 50), your allegiance to the organized scientific crime is so transparent to be offensive. No judgment on a motion is proffered by serious persons without the joint quotation of the counter-motion (that has yet to be filed in this case!). The hiding of your Jewishness in support of unethical and anti-American conduct by Jewish brothers (Post 35) is equally offensive because it implies that all of us "gentiles" (meaning "inferior" in Hebrew as you have been taught since your childhood) are so stupid not to see it or so wile not to denounce it. In view of such a despicable conduct, I believe that you are not a "Jewish-American" . You are a Jew exploiting America for your evil deeds. Zwe67up

Post 52.
Zwe67up (Post 510 - "You are a Jew exploiting America for your evil deeds." No. Don't think so. I'm a lapsed Episcopalian. The admin, so quick to expose what he felt (with no basis in fact) to be an alias, should also be quick to reject overt anti-semitism. It has no place in a nominally scientific discussion, and no place in polite conversation generally. Zwe56io

Post 53.
Zwi30yp (Ppst 51)- I would be fascinated to read about the lying and cheating of van Erp and Israel. Can you please provide a link which works? Swe57io

Post 54.
This is a question for James Martin (Post 41): why do you do not give in your post the names of people who use their real name in the Pepijn van Erp's Blog". OK. On the "Stupidity of Santilli" example, there is Nathan Schmidt, Pierre Savoy, Frank Stone, Christian Corda, Cosmin Visan, Dana Bridenbaker, Andy Roundtree, Justin Asaya, Sue Johnson. The only likely alias is Smut Clyde, and that's not for sure. There are another half-dozen who only use first names. 2 more are not "real".Ap20qp

Post 55.
Hello Episcopalian friend of Jews, Zwe56io (Post 52). Something is not kicking right in your brain. . You believe that Jews can trow the dirtiest unprovoked words against non-Jewish scientists who should not respond. So you believe that the Jewish people are a superior race and all of us, including you, we have to be all servants. This is perhaps the case in Japan but not in America where we are all equal. Also, according to the Webster dictionary, anti-semitism is an act of hostility or discrimination against "all" Jews on grounds of religion or ethnic nature. Your brain is not clicking right because a just response to "one" Jew, James Martin, does not imply,. by no means, an action against "all" Jews. Therefore, your use of the word "anti-Semitism" is very dishonest. It seems clear you wrote the post in the dream of getting favors from your Jewish friends. Gre57sp

Post 56.
I believe that the Episcopalian friend (Post 52) is a mercenary like van Erp because Jews tend to hide and hire other people for their things. A ,most important case is that of 9-11. Jews hired Giuliani, the New York Mayor of the time, and others for the control of the info released to Americans. A Saudi Prince offered $10M to the victims under the condition that American people knew that all terrorist were Palestinians thrown out of Palestine with temporary asylum from the Saudis. They destroyed our towers in response of our unilateral support for Israel for over half a century in violation of our Constitution. All news media in the U.S.A. identified the terrorist as Saudis. The Saudi prince was so upset that he donated the $10M to Bin Laden. In the event this Episcopalian dubs as antisemitic the citation of the price we have paid for our unilateral support of Israel, he is a traitor and certainly not an American. Zwe67uo

Post 57.
As an American, I was disturbed by Post 52 because the author clearly supports unprovoked slander by Jews of a senior US scientist such as Santilli working on technologies significant for our national security (Post 35), thus implying the consideration of Jews as a superior race in America. He clearly supports the continuation of one century of Jewish control of science via the discreditation of dissidents. He clearly supports the Jewish physicists of the Manhattan project who, after being saved from the Nazis by us, they perpetrated thee biggest treason in our history, by "passing" the secrets of the atomic bombs to their Jewish brothers in Russia. Post 56 treats for the damage we had to sustain for our support of Jews in 9-11. not to mention the countless American lives lost in so many terrorist attacks against our civilization planes, all denouncing the same thing: our excessive support for Israel against other people. I could go on and on and on. .We are all in agreement that the existence of Israel and the respect of clean Jewish actions are sacred because written in the Scripture we all venerate. However, the hysteria of equally supporting blatantly unethically Jewish actions is sick, besides being extremely anti-American. Hsd20ep

Post 58.
Hsd20ep - Please see claim 2 of post 41. If true, it invalidates the basis of your objection. Even if post 35 is valid, the rest of your statement does not follow. At a start, in the Manhattan Project Fuchs was British and had never "been saved" from the Nazis, and the Rosenbloom/Greenglass couples were native-born Americans. And there were no "Jewish brothers" in Russia, either. In all cases, the individuals behaved not as Jews but as Communists, and thus contradict your assertions.Cwe49yo

Post 59.
I am a member of the International Committee for Scientific Ethics and Accountability, and this is my testimonial. The Committee was indeed initiated by Prof. Santilli jointly with the late Prof. Asterios Jannussis of the University of Patras, Greece, Prof. Grigorios Tsagas, Chairman of the Department of Mathematics of Thessaloniki University, Greece Prof. Jaak Lohmus from the Estonia Academy of Science, and others I cannot identify. We organized an international network allowing each of us to access to the website as well as to the email under the name of Luca Petronio as a com,on alias/ As stated in the website and documented, Prof. Santilli left the Committee in 2007 when he acquired the position of CEO of the publicly traded company Magnegas Corporation and, since that time, he has not made contributions I know of, and he has actually complained for a number of articles in the website. . I spoke by phone with Prof. Santilli and he told me that he has stated the above during his de[position recorded by movies. he said that he did not have time to check the very long transcripts. Hence he considers the movies the sole true documentation of his deposition. These are the facts. The rest is the very reason for the existence of our Committee: denounce defamation of Prof. Santilli (and others) for scientific corruption because intended to oppose his research beyond Einstein via personal attacks without any serious technical argument. . Zx35ro Qwe4-yy

Post 60.
Zx35ro Qwe4-yy (post 59) stated, "he (Santilli) said that he did not have time to check the very long transcripts. Hence he considers the movies the sole true documentation of his deposition. These are the facts." If true, you should make every effort to get Santilli to check the transcript. Santilli may consider the "movies" the true documentation, but the court will not, and will decide the case based on the transcripts. Generally, after a transcript has been generated, copies will be sent to each party to the deposition, and they will have a certain amount of time (often 30 days) to submit corrections. After that, the transcript becomes the official record. This fact supersedes Santilli's opinion.

Santilli's position that he "does not have the time" to check the transcripts is mind-boggling. Does he want to win the suit? The only rational motive I can come up with for this attitude is that Santilli is preparing a fall-back position in case of defeat, at which time he can blame it on corrupt transcription. I would rather not think this is the case, but it's the only reason that I can see short of arrogant self-delusion.

Unless Santill wants to lose his suit, he should cease denying reality. For the purposes of his lawsuit, the transcript is the "sole true documentation", and failing to recognize this fact will only cause Santilli problems. Of course, it's entirely possible that it's too late for him to exercise control over the record of his deposition, but if not he should immediately start paying attention. If he has not heard this from his lawyer, he needs a new lawyer, and needs one yesterday. If he has rejected his lawyer's advice on the matter, I'm afraid there's not much anyone can do for him. Xre34yu

Post 601
I am flabbergasted. Post 59 starts, "I am a member of the International Committee for Scientific Ethics and Accountability, and this is my testimonial." Of course, the author remains anonymous and therefor not accountable. Several of the committee (assuming the unaccountable statement is correct) remain unidentified, and a common alias (Petronius) was used to further make accountability by the committee impossible. Does the writer support fornication for chastity? How clueless can a person get? Zse20yt

==============