HOME     |     PHYSICS     |     BIOLOGY     |     CHEMISTRY


EDITORIAL NOTE

We provide below the link to the public pleadings of the lawsuit filed by Ruggero and Carla Santilli, Plaintiffs, against Frank Israel, Pepjin van Erp et al, Defendants

Lawsuit against Frank Israel and Pepjin van Erp

while offering to the scientific community the possibility of expressing comments in an anonymous way without editorial contributions except for the of screening of posts with Wikipedia rules. Posts up to 150 words can be placed in the message box, while longer posts, pictures and and documents n should be emailed to "admin(at)galileoprincipia(dot)



Post 1.
For God's sake, can anybody outline why the Santilli's sued Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp? Thanks. Zwe44ui

Post 2.
I looked at the court documents/pleadings that are available on the internet. I was astonished to see the unprovoked, relentless and vicious attacks carried out at the personal, scientific and industrial levels by Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp (FII and PVE) against a senior scientist such as Prof. Santilli (see his Biographical Notes and the Full Curriculum) . One should inspect the first filing 0 Doc. 064 P Motion . Motion 064 2018-03-17 09:39 6 of Public Pleadings, especially the attachments. The unprovoked attacks for seven years were launched by Frank Israel, Pepijin van Erp and others via numerous websites of the Dutch Skeptic Society and in Dutch, English, French, German and Italian , such as
https://kloptdatwel.nl/search_gcse/?q=Ruggero%20Santilli
http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/2016/02/the-continuing-stupidity-of-ruggero-santilli/
http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/articles/finding-jerdsey-v-kadeisvili-or-mailing-withruggero-m-santilli
http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/2016/11/sued-by-ruggero-santilli
http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/2016/08/santilli-shenanigans
http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl

These internet attacks were then translated in Dutch, Italian, French and German websites. To understand the dimension of this organized international slander, Frank Israel and his employee Pepijin van Erp have worked full time for years via the use of illegal SEO techniques to keep these slanderous websites at the top of Google search under Santilli as, anybody can verify, resulting in tens of thousands of websites all over the world. All written requests for moderation by Carla Santilli personally to Frank Israel were ignored.

Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp used these defaming websites to disrupt Santilli's personal, scientific and industrial activities. As an illustration, Santilli and his group had participated for five years to the series of conferences ICNAAM organized in Greece by Theodore Simos. See in particular the (see the Program-ICNAAM-2014 showing the name Santilli in titles, let alone the content, most of the 2014 conference. Such a great success by Santilli was clearly a disproof of the slanderous websites. Therefore, Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp convinced Robert Brown, then President of the American Institute of Physics - AIP (a notorious member of their ring) to have Simos stop admitting Santilli and his group at his meetings under threat of stopping the AIP publication of his proceedings. Simos had no other choice than to comply, Santilli and his group, including distinguished full professors from prestigious universities were prohibited to attend, and we, Americans lost our face in scientific circles on three continents.

The unprovoked industrial damage cased by Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp to Santilli and his associates is rather substantial. As you can see in his Biographical Notes, Santilli is the founder and stockholder of two publicly traded companies, one traded at NASDAQ and the other traded at the OTC. The vicious attacks in corporate blogs by Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp have been so organized, relentless and vulgar to cause millions of dollars of losses in the value of the stock owned by tens of thousands of stockholders (see the sworn Affidavits of corporate officers in the attachments of indicated first filing). Predictable huge pressure on Santilli to sue by stockholders and investors alike, left the Santilli's no other choice than to sue Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp. There are rumors that a disgusted investor from New York has offered unlimietd funds for the lawsuits, first in the U.S.A. and perhaps later on - in Europe.

The issues of direct relevance to the U. S. as well as international physics community are endless, such as: have Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp acted on their own or under a mandate from higher levels of their ring? Why was this relentless and vicious attack launched? Who are the beneficiaries? Should the U.S.A. keep tolerating these vicious attacks by foreigners? What are the implications for much needed new technologies, etc. Vsa45uo

Post 3.
According to an Investigative Agency hired by the International Committee on Scientific Ethics and Accountabilty (ICSEAA), Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp were commissioned to do their unethical campaign against the Santilli's by Arthur Rubin, David Epstein and Frank Bernstein, controllers of the Wikipedia "Article" on Santilli. As everybody can see, that Article has been structured and kept for decades to discredit Santilli's research because his beliefs are not aligned with the main interests of the Wikipedia-academic complex. In fact, said editors quote in the article the absolute most unprofessional and unqualified sources such as Pepijin van Erp who has no formal education at all, let alone any education in the post Ph. D. research by Santilli, while carefully avoiding the quotation of Santilli's articles published in refereed journals that are not aligned with their interests. It should be known that said editor set the article to automatic rejection of any improvements whatsoever by numerous scientists around the globe for decades. Clearly, the discereditation of Santilli's research in the Wikipedia article needed some form of external back up.

The same Investigative Agency has also uncovered that Rubin-Epstein-Weinstein and their global associates perpetrated truly incredible acts of scientific gangsterism, such as: commissioning the journalist member of their group Carrie Weimar to write a negative profile on Santilli, which she did (see said Article); commissioning the "engineer" J. M. Calo at Brown University, RI, another notorious member of said interests, to write a paper of strong criticism on Santilli's post Ph. D. discovery in "chemistry" of the new chemical special of magnecules, who, of course, did as requested; use the unfortunate credibility the negative depiction of Santilli in Wikipedia, obstructed Santilli's technical presentation at NASA in the use of his new species to improve safety and trust for aerospace rosiest; and perpetrated additional true acts of "scientific banditism"; requested the organizers of the 2014 International Conference by the American Institute of Applied Sciences held in Madrid, Spain http://aimsciences.org/conferences/2014/index.html To close the already organized session on Santilli's Isodifferential Calculus and Lie Santilli theory with ensuing investigation initiated by the organizers (Carla Santilli and other participants can provide affidavit of the case); and did additional true acts of "scientific banditism" hardly credible for their protracted impunity. Jer45io

Post 4.
To my knowledge as a follower of Santilli's research for years, the origin of the lawsuit by the Santilli's against Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp must be traced back to Septemebr 1987 when R. M. Santilli became a member of the faculty of then Lyman Laboratory of Physics of Harvard University whose history is described in all details in his 1984 book [1] Il Grande Grido - Ethical Problem of Einstein followers in the U.S.A: An Insider's View, in which the link includes the Documentation of Il Grande Grido, Vols. I, II and III (1985) Alpha Publishing.

It appears that this particular lawsuit provides final evidence on the conspiracy against the research by Ruggero M. Santilli by "organized academic, financial and ethnic interests on Einstein" [1] because he dared to surpass Einstein at the mathematical, theoretical and experimental levels. These studies were not intended for the conditions conceived by Einstein (dynamical problem in vacuum), but for much more complex conditions unthinkable during Einstein's time, dynamical problems within physical media which admit Einstein's conditions as a particular case. To understand the illegal character of the conspiracy, we should indicate upfront that the "inapplicability" of Einstein theories for dynamics within physical media is beyond scientific doubt for endless reasons treated in refereed papers, e.g.,: Einstein's theories are reversible over time while the indicated interior condition processes are irreversible; it is impossible to define special and general relativity within physical media; it is impossible to verify the assumed constancy of the speed of light within physical media due to the lack of an inertial reference frame; the speed of light within physical media (when transparent) is locally varying in any case; etc.

The conspiracy was initiated in 1978 by Steven Weinberg, Shelly Glashow and Sidney Coleman at the Lyman Laboratory of Physics at Harvard University and by Herman Feshback at MIT. Santilli was invited by the Department of "Energy" to initiate studies of irreversibility via his pioneering papers on Lie-admissible theories because it was needed for a serious study of all "energy" releasing processes. These studies clearly implied a structural broadening of Einstein's theories since, as indicated, the latter are strictly reversible over time. Weinberg-Glashow-Coleman strongly opposed the will of the United States Government, and publicly declared "Santilli studies have no physical value." To understand the dimension of the conspiracy, one should know that tidies on Santilli's irreversible Lie-admissible formulations remain prohibited in academia in all developed countries, although conducted in silence in corporations because essential for the study of energy releasing processes.

As part of his studies of irreversibility, Santilli needed to achieve a representation of nuclear magnetic moments (that was and is still missing) via Fermi's hypothesis that nucleons are deformed by nuclear strong interactions with consequential deformation of their intrinsic magnetic moments. The study of this historical hypothesis implied a structural generalization of the heart of Einstein special relativity, the symmetry under rotation (that Santilli achieved via his Lear-isotopic and Lie-admissible theories). Feshback and his group at MIT strongly opposed such a generalization with rather "theatrical acts" [1]. For instance, thanks to the international cooperation by members of the indicated organized interests, Feshback managed to prohibit H. Rauch from Austria (a leader in neutron interferometry) to access his laboratory at the University of Grenoble, France, in order to verify his initial announcement of deformability of nucleon under strong interactions. To understand the power of the indicated organized interests on Einstein, one should know that the experimental confirmation of Fermi's historical hypothesis on the deformability of nucleons has remained prohibited to this day in all universities of developed countries, except for manipulated tests without exposure of nucleons to strong interactions. The demonstrability of nucleons via Santilli's Lie-isotopic and Lie-admissible theories is silently studied in corporate conduits by achieving the first and only known exact representation of nuclear magnetic moments so essential for new clean energies that are much needed by mankind, yet strongly opposed by organized interests on Einstein.

After Santilli left Harvard (somewhat disgusted) in 1983, the obstructions by Weinberg-Hogwash-Coleman-Feshback-et al their world wide organization against Santilli as a person and against his research were multiplied. Prior to this conspiracy, Santilli had regularly published papers in journals of the American, Italian and British physical society. In 1984, these societies received "orders" from said organization to prohibit the publication of any additional papers by Santilli, and so it was and it is the case to this day [2] 2008 update of "Il Grande Grido" see Santilli selected papers in the references. Renato Angelo Ricci, then a disgraceful President of the Italian Physical Society, put it in writing: "Santilli, your papers cannot be published in our journals because they are opposed by your colleagues at Harvard" Santilli was also the victim of truly unbelievable vexation, such as the prohibition for him to attend a meeting on his most important creation, hadronic mechanics, organized by said interests at the University of Southern Iowa at Cedar Falls under public U. S. financial support. Quite distressing for me, as a U. S. Citizen, to see the documentation of the prohibition for Santilli to attend any physics meeting organized in the U.S.A with public funds, such as meetings at FERMILAB, SLAC, or national laboratories and see numerous act of "scientific bandits" [2].

At the advent of the internet era, Sidney Coleman and Herman Feshback had died, and Steven Weinberg could only operate in the shadow due to his known illiteracy on this new technology. Hence, the torch of the international, organized conspiracy against Santilli passed to Arthur Rubin, David Epstein and Mark Bernstein, the controllers of Santilli's "Article" at Wikipedia. According to an Investigative Agency hired by the International Committee on Scientific Ethics and Accountability (ICSEAA) Rubin-Epstein-Weinstein and their world wide associates perpetrated truly incredible acts of scientific gangsterism, such as: commissioning the journalist member of their group Carrie Weimar to write a negative profile on Santilli, which she did (see said Article); commissioning the "engineer" J. M. Calo at Brown University, RI, another notorious member of said interests to write a paper of strong criticism on Santilli's post Ph. D. discovery in "chemistry" of the new chemical special of magnecules, who, of course, did it as requested; use the unfortunate credibility the negative depiction of Santilli in Wikipedia, obstructed Santilli technical presentation at NASA in the use of his new species to improve safety and trust for aerospace rosiest; and perpetrated additional true acts of "scientific banditism"; requested the organizers of the 2014 International Conference by the American Institute of Applied Sciences held in Madrid, Spain http://aimsciences.org/conferences/2014/index.html To close the already organized session on Santilli's Isodifferential Calculus and Lie Santilli theory with ensuing investigation initiated by the organizers (Carla Santilli and other participants can provide affidavit of the case); and did additional true acts of "scientific banditism" hardly credible for their protracted impunity.

Santilli's lawsuit against Frank Install (head of the Dutch Skeptic Society), his employee Pepijin van Erp et al. from The Netherlands provides the final evidence of the international, organized conspiracy by "academic, financial and ethnic interests on Einstein's theories" against Santilli's mathematical, theoretical and experimental research beyond Einstein. The main issue for the USA is: How long should the academic, financial and ethnic interests on Einstein" should be allowed to continue their unethical control of science under the misuse of billions of taxpayers dollars. Zew75oy

Post 5.
I was a graduate student in physics at Harvard at the time when Professor Santilli was there and I remember very well when in early 1978 he presenetd to the faculty there the research on irreversibility under his DOE grant. I remeber that well becasue I was interested in the field, due to its novelty and application to energies, and actually started to do research in it, but I had to stop to survive in academia due to the reasons so eloquently explained by the Editorial team of Harvard's Crimson The Politics of Science

Santilli first presenetd to Steven Weinberg, Shelly Glashow and Sydney Coleman the main need for his studies on irreversibility, namely, their need for quantitative studies on all energy releasing processes; he then showed the origin of the reversibility over time of Einstein's special relativity and quantum mechanics, such as the invariance of the Lie product under anti-Hermiticity [A,B] = - [A, B]; and finally showed the historical initiation of studies on irreversibility by Lagrange and Hamilton via the external terms in their celebrated equations. The later point was illustrated with the "vignetta" ("little sketch" in Italian) one can see in page 189 of Il Grande Grido - Ethical Problem of Einstein followers in the U.S.A: An Insider's View,


I remember that Weinberg, Glashow and Coleman were visibly unhappy at this presentation and indeed they later on stated to everybody, including to Santilli's graduate students, that "Santilli studies have no physical value." During the same session, Santilli also represented the "vignetta" (see page 190 of Il Grande Grido)

showing the "universality" of his Lie-admissible formulations, since Lie-admissible algebras in Santilli's form with product (A, B) - ARB - BSA is the most general known algebra with a bi-linear product over a field of characteristic zero, thus including as particular cases all known algebras. This universality made Weinberg, Glashow and Coleman even more nervous.... The rest is described and documented in Il Grande Grido. Xwe76to

Post 6.
One of the mosy dishonest claims by "organzied academic, financial and ethnic interests on Einstein" against Santilli is that he only published in his Journal, the Hadronic Journal. Therefore, out of the 325+ papers and 30 post Ph. D. monographs in physics and chemistry available from his Public Pleadings, I selected the following representative papers poublished in journals of the American, Italian, British Physical Societies and other refereed journals around the world. Gew40yp. Note that, before joining the faculty of Harvard University, Santilli was obviously publishing in journals of various physical societies, but after leaving Harvard these poublications were prohibited and he published his paper in other refereed journals around the world. Ter23qw

PAPERS PUBLISHED IN PHYSICAL REVIEW
OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY
Phys. Rev. D Vol. 20, 555-570 (1979)
Phys. Rev. D Vol. 1, 2753-2765 (1970)
Phys. Rev. D Vol. 7, 2447-2456 (1973)
Phys. Rev. D Vol. 10, 3396-3406 (1974)
Phys. Rev. D Vol. 22, 892?907 (1980)

PAPERS PUBLISHED IN IL NUOVO CIMENTO
OF THE ITALIAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY
Supplemento al Nuovo Cimento 6, 1225-1249 (1968)
Meccanica Vol. 1, 3-11 (1969)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 44, 1284-1289 (1966)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 51, 89-107 (1967)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 51, 748 (1967)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 51, 570-576 (1967)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 55B, 578-586 (1968)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 56B, 323-326 (1968)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 6, 1225-1249 (1968)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 2, 449-455 (1969)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 5, 551-590 (1971)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 2, 965-1015 (1971)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 12, 185-204 (1972)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 33, 145-153 (1982)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 37, 545-555 (1983)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 37, 337-344 (1983)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 37, 509-521 (1983)
Nuovo Cimento Vol. 37, 505-508 (1983)

PAPERS PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL OF THE
BRITISH INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS
Journal of Physics Vol. 1, 1-26 (1995)
J. Moscow Phys. Soc. Vol. 3, 255-280 (1993)

PAPERS PUBLISHED IN OTHER REFEREED JOURNALS
International Journal of Physics Vol. 1, 1-26 (1995)
Balkan Journal of Geometry and its Applications, Vol. 1, pp. 61-73 (1996)
Journal of Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories, Vol. 1, 121-193 (2003)
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 31, pages 1113 1128 (2006)
The Open Astronomy Journal Vol. 3, pages 126-144, 2010
Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 12, pages 165-188 (2012)
Italian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 31, pages 239-254 (2013)
Journal of computational methods in sciences and engineering (JCMSE), 13 (2013) 37-50
Italian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Vol. 31, pages 239-254 (2013)
Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering Vol. 14, pp 405-415 (2014)
American Journal of Modern Physics, Vol. 4, pp 5-9, (2015)
American Journal of Modern Physics Vol. 4, p. 15-18 (2015)
American Journal of Modern Physics Vol. 4, pages 26-43, (2015)
American Journal of Modern Physics Vol. 4(5), pages 59-75 (2015)
American Journal of Modern Physics Vol. 4, No. 5, (2015)
Ameriucan Journal of Modern Physiucs, Vol. Vol. 5, issue 2, p. 56 (2016)
American Journal of Modern Physivcs Vol. 4, issue 2, p. 185 (2016)
American Journal of Modwern Physics Vol. 5, No. 2-1, (2016)
American Journal of Modern POhysics Vol. 5, No. 2-1, (2016)
American Journal of Modern Physics 2017; 6(4-1): 29-45
\ American Journal of Modern Physics 2017; 6(4-1): 46-52
American Journal of Modern Physics, Vol. 6(4-1), page 85-104 (2017)
American Journal of Modern Physics 2017; 6(4-1): 105-109
American Journal of Modern Physics 2016; 5(2-1): 56-118
Hyperfine Interactions Vol. 109, pp. 63-81 (1997)
Int. J. Theor. Phys. Vol. 2, 201-211 (1969)
J. Theor. Phys. Vol. 3, 233-241 (1970)
J. Math. Phys. Vol. 11, 2297-2301 (1970)
Annals of Physics Vol. 83, 108-157 (1974)
Physics Essays Vol. 5, 44-46 (1992)
J. Phys. G: Nucl & Part. Phys. Vol. 18, L61-L65 (1992)
J. Phys. G: Nucl. & Part. Phys., Vol. 18, L141-L146 (1992)
J. Moscow Phys. Soc. Vol. 3, 255-280 (1993)
JINR Rapid Comm. Vol. 6, 24-38 (1993)
L. De Brfoglie Vol. 18, pp. 71-389 (1993)
Comm. Theor. Phys. Vol. 3, 47-66 (1994)
Comm. Theor. Phys. Vol. 3, 153-181 (1994)
Chinese J. Syst. Eng. & Electr. Vol. 6, 157-176 (1995)
Intern. J. Quantum Chem. Vol. 26, 175-187 (1995)
Chine J. Syst. Eng. & Electr. Vol. 6, 177-199 (1995)
Revista Tecnica Vol. 18, 271-284 (1995)
Comm. Theor. Phys. Vol. 4, (1995)
Indian J. Mathematics Vol. 37, 235-256 (1995)
World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 369-383 (1996)
World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 500-505 (1996)
Anale Stintifice Universitatii Ovidius Constanta Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 113-126 (1996)
Rendiconti Circolo Matematico Palermo, Suppl. Vol. 42, pp. 7-82 (1996)
Anale Stiintifice Univ. Al.I. Cuza, Matematica, Vol. XLII, pp. 121-72 (1996)
Balkan Journal of Geometry and its Applications, Vol. 1, pp. 61-73 (1996)
Revista Tecnica Univ. Zulia Vol. 19, 69-84 (1996)
Rev. Tec. Ingegn. Univ. Zulia Vol. 19, pp. 3-16 (1996)
Indian J. Math. Vol. 38, pp. 1-24 (1996)
Balkan Society of Geometers, Volume 1, pp. 83-94, Balkan Society of Geometers (1997)
World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 549-556 (1997)
Gravitation, Vol. 3, no. 2 (1997)
Foundations of Physics, vol. 27, 625-740 (1997)
Foundations of Physics Letters Vol. 10, 307-327 (1997)
Indian J. Mathematics Vol. 38, pp. 43-54 (1997)
Found. Phys. Letters Vol. 11, pp. 483-493 (1998)
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Vol. 50, pp. 167-175 (1998)
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Vol. 50, pp. 177-190 (1998)
Intern. J. of Phys. Vol. 4, pp. 1-70 (1998)
Modern Physics Letters Vol. 13, 327-335 (1998)
Int. J. Mod. Phys. D Vol. 7, 351-407 (1998)
Infinite Energy, Vol. 22, pp. 33-49 (1998)
Infinite Energy, Vol. 19, 72-78 (1998)
Intern. J. Modern Phys. A Vol. 14, pp. 3157-33206 (1999)
Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy Vol. 24, 943-956 (1999)
Communications in Math. and Theor. Phys. Vol. 2, 1-12 (1999)
Intern. J. Modern Phys. A Vol. 14, pp. 2205-2238 (1999)
Infinite Energy, Vol. 23, pp. 69-74 (1999)
Infinite Energy, Vol. 25, pp. 75-85 (1999)
Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy Vol. 25, pp. 173-183 (2000)
Nova Science Publishers, pp. 421-442 (2000)
Comm. Math. & Theor. Phys. Vol. 2, 1-66 (2001)
Foundation of Physics, Vol. 32, pages 1111-1140 (2002)
Journal of Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories, Vol. 1, 121-193 (2003)
Advances in Algebras, K. P. Shum et al. Editors, pages 185-220 (2003)
Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Volume 29 Hors s«erie 2, (2004)
Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Volume 29, pages 953-968 (2004)
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 31, pages 1113 1128 (2006)
IBR preprint TPH-03-05 (2005), galilean Electrodynamics Vol. 17, Special issue 3, pp. 42-54 (2006)
IBR preprint TPH-09-05 (2005), Journal Applied Sciences, in press (2006)
General Bibliography on Hadronic Mathematics, Mechanics and Chemistry (2008)
The Open Astronomy Journal Vol. 3, pages 126-144, 2010
New Advances in Physics, Vol. 4, pages 18-41 (2010)
Sankata Printing Press, Nepal (2011)
Italian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 31, pages 239-254 (2013)
Journal of computational methods in sciences and engineering (JCMSE), 13 (2013) 37-50
Italian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Vol. 31, pages 239-254 (2013)
Clifford Analysis, Clifford algebras and their applications." Vol. 3, 2014,pages 1-26
Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering Vol. 14, pp 405-415 (2014)
Clifford Analysis, Clifford Algebras and their Applications Vol. 3, pages 1-26, (2014)
Foundation of Chemistry, DOI 10.1007/s10698-015-9218-z (March 24, 2015)
Generalized Lie Theory and Applications Vol. 9, 230-235 (2015)
Clifford Algebras and their Applications (2017)
Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, March 8-10, 2010
Journal of Generalized Lie Theories, in pores (2017)

Post 7.
Hackers mask their location, so how does one know if the hackers were really located in Tel Aviv? Lre99pp

Post 8.
I believe that the originators of the clear, conspiracy that prompted the lawsuit, namely, Steven Weinberg, Shelly Glashow, Sidney Coleman, Herman Feshback, Arthur Rubin, David Epstein, Mark Bernstein, Joseph Calo, Frank Israel, Robert Brown, etc. and their affiliates in all physics departments around the world, are very dishonest and anti-American people without any sense of shame, just pure greed for their interests on Einstein. In fact, they have attacked for about half a century without any provocation via vulgar slander on personal scientific and industrial grounds a senior American scientist of the caliper of SIR Ruggero Maria Santilli ( Prof. R. M. Santilli Biographical Notes and the Full Curriculum)) for his "surpassing ofd Einstein at the mathematical, theoretical and experikmental levels while not being a member of their ring." Since the information is intentionally suppressed the Wikipedia Article" and in other sources, we proudly recall that, besides the long list of awards available in his Biographical notes, Prof. Santilli was knighted in September 2011 by the Republic of San Marino with the m membership in the millenary Equestrian Order of Sant'Agata (see the Documentation of Prof. santilli's Awards) Mnd34as

Post 9.
I hope and expect that your lawsuit will fail and that you will stop sending your spam emails to me and others. Aqq55oo

Post 10.
Yes, Aqq55oo, it is quite possible that the Santilli's will lose their lawsuit against Frank Israel and Pepijin van Erp because in America there are no laws against defamation. However, you will not like to know that the filing per se has already proved the existence of a conspiracy by your ring against new advances beyond Einstein. Also, it will make you even more unhappy to know that irate investors of Santilli's technologies have offered money for the continuation of the lawsuit in Europe where there are indeed strict laws against defamation. Wd73ge

Post 11.
Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington of the U. S. Federal Court, Middle District of Florida, denied this afternoon, March 22, 2018, the motion to dismiss the defendant Frank Israel as well as the separate motion for dismiss of the entire lawsuit by defendant Pepin van Erp, see Docket 067 in the Public records

Post 12.
The Santilli should file a strong complain at the American Bar Association against the defendants' attorney James J. McGuire (601 South Boulevard, Tampa, Florida 33606) for unethical conduct because his public pleadings constitute serious slander against Prof R. M. Santilli since they contain defaming claims disputed by known evidence. Here is an example. At the international conference ICNPAA 2016, held at the University of La Rochelle, France, on July 4 to 9, 2016, Prof. Santilli delivered an invited plenary lecture on his mathematical, theoretical and industrial advances, not for the conditions conceived by Einstein (known as exterior problems of point particles in vacuum), but for conditions beyond those known at Einstein;'s time (known as interior problems of extended particles within physical media), see the scientific paper on the lecture

R. M. Santilli "An introduction to the new sciences for a new era," Invited paper, SIPS 2016, Hainan Island, China Clifford Analysis, Clifford Algebras and their Applications (Cambridge, UK), Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 1-119, 2017
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/new-sciences-new-era.pdf

Following the predictable success of this plenary lecture due, Prof. Santilli received during the banquet of the conference the following Scientific Award which, as one can see, is signed by all three organizers

Due to its importance and academic origin, this award proved the vicious character of the slanderous attacks against Prof., Santilli by the organized international conspiracy against the :surpassing of Einstein's theories clearly established by this lawsuit and by preceding posts. In order to implement the mandate received from Arthur Rubin, David Ep[stein and Mark Bernstein (editor of the slanderous Wikipedia "Article" on Prof. Santilli, see preceding posts) the defendant Frank Israel published in the Website of the Dutch Skeptic Society
the following vicious statement against Prof. Santilli.

Shenanegans by Ruggero Santilli: - "To most people it will be clear that this award was instigated by Mr. S. himself and that he just asked his co-worker Georgiev to organize the signatures. There is a clue that this piece of paper was doctored at the offices of Mr. S.: the filename of the picture is 'TARPON_2.jpg', which points to the address of his business (1444 Rainville Road, Tarpon Springs, Florida). I'm sure that these are just two more events we can add to the long list of fringe activities on Santilli's curriculum vitae."

which statement was then reproduced by the paid mercenary in scientific crimes, the defendant Pepijn van Erp in his defaming websites in English, French, German and Italian (See the list ion Post 2) and used in its integrity by attorney McGuire in its public pleading (see Docket 064). The problem for Israel, van Erp, Rubin, Epstein, Bernstein, McGuire and their affiliates is that, per public knowledge in the Website of the 2016 ICNPAA Conference, the News of the R. M. Santilli Foundation, and other public releases, the Scientific Award was granted to Prof. Santilli (and other distinguished scientists) during the banquet of the meeting under the presence of all three organizers, as documented by the following pictures and numerous other by the participants

The manifest impossibility for Prof. santilli to fake his La Rochelle Scientific Award and show it in the presence of the organizers establishes the violation of the Ethical Rules of the American Bar Association by attorney James J. McGuire for which he should be kept accountable. The remaining public pleadings by McGuire are full of similar reproductions of defaming claims by the defendants without any documentary support, thus confirming the intentional slander of Prof. Santilli, and ensuing unethical conduct.

As an additional evidence of the existence of the "international, organized, scientific crime on Einstein," one should know that, per their admission, Frank Israel and Pepijn van Erp asked assistance to discredit Prof. Santilli's Scientific Award to Robert Brown, then president of the American Institute of Physics (AIP), who in turn requested in writing to the organizers of the La Rochelle conference the removal of the AIP name in the list of sponsors -specifically and solely 0- for Prof. Santilli scientific award, which request was flatly denied by the organizers. How long can America survive as an advanced technological civilization under the one century old dominance of this "organized scientific crime on Einstein"? Prof. and Mrs. Santilli have been the sole Americans to date who had the courage of confronting this "organized scientific crime" to serve America against their own interests. How about you, reader? Are you a member of this "organized scientific crime on Einstein" or an accomplice by silence? Please disprove this gloomy scenario and express your views. Zwe290ys

Post 13.
I wonder who is footing the substantial costs of a lawsuit in the U. S. Federal Court since Israel and van Erp are known to be little people with limited income? Bse22ytu

Post 14.
I heard that the defendants bills are paid by a certain attorney Kim White from California in apparent support of the First Amendment of the U. S. Constitution.

Post 15.
It appears that White's brain is not clicking wright since the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitutions solely applies to U.S. citizens. The defendants are European citizens under strict European laws prohibiting slander and defamation that are smply non-existing in the U.S.A..

Post 16.
I heard that White is merely channeling to McGuire US taxpayer money secured via a fake appointment of Israel as part of an NSF research grant. I wonder whether somebody can check this out. Lre88as

Post 17.
But then, who is footing the bills for the Santillis?Bdsd23ui

Apparently, a N. Y. investor who has been really p... op... by Israel and van Erp for his substantial losses in stock (see Post 2) has offered to the Santillis all necessary funds to continue the lawsuit in Europe. I assume the Santillis are footing the bills for the lawsuit in U. S. Federal Court. Cwe70mn

Post 18.
In the event confirmed, I would be outraged at the fact that American money is used to foot the bills for foreigners to interfere in our lives in the vicious way documented in Post 12. Zwe57io

Post 19.
I very seriously doubt that Santilli has been the only scientist to feel the wrath of the organized interests on Einstein's theories, because the list is extremely long, Here are the better known cases.
Fritz Zwicky,
The Swiss author of the 1929 hypothesis of Tired Light, was fiercely attacked by the German speaking members of the organization because his hypothesis implied the possibility of changing the frequency of light during flight - which is in gross violation of Einsteins special relativity. There are even rumors in Europe that his better-half was also under attack by other wives from the organization. Under such combined pressure, he caved in a condition to remain in academia at the time (1930's) and dismissed his hypothesis of tired light, although he died without accepting the hyperbola of the expansion of the universe.
Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons
The authors of the 1990 tentative and well presented announcement of apparent nuclear fusions at ambient temperature, were accused of "fraud" at CNN by Herman Feshback the morning after their cautious scientific announcement, the reason being were said fusions were known to violate Einstein's special relativity and quantum mechanics (relativistic quantum mechanics). The attacks were so extreme and prejudiced that both Englishman and Pons were forced to leave America and move to Germany where they continued their study.
Halton Arp,
The experimental astrophysicist at Harvard University, who discovered quasars physically attached to galaxies while their respective cosmological redshifts are dramatically different. He was approached by Irving Shapiro, Sidney Coleman and other physicist at Harvard who requested him to publish a paper of dismissal of his discovery because Arps' pair are clear experiments of verification of the lack of expansion of the universe, with consequential lack of validity in cosmology of Einstein special relativity. Arp refused to comply and, even though he was the recipient of a substantial governmental grant, he was unable to locate an academic position anywhere in the US, thus being forced to move with his family to Germany where he continued his studies. To really understand the capillary character and criminal intent of the organization, one should know that Arp was refused access to any astrophysics laboratory anywhere in the world.
Eugene Mallove,
A physicist who left MIT because of apparent fraud in the local repetition of the experiment by Fleishmann and Pons, created the magazine Infinite Energy, and conducted a relentless attack for ethical misconduct in the MIT Physics department. Mallove was murdered in 2004 under very mysterious circumstances. The person that has been accused as the originator of the murder, continues his claim to be innocent (of course) and both the judge and the prosecutors have been identified as members of the organization.
Ruggero Maria Santilli,
An Italian-American physicist who conducted a traditional academic lift by publishing in the journals of various physical societies, until he landed a position at Harvard University under DOE support with the the request of developing quantitative treatment of irreversible processes, for the first time ever, including most importantly, all energy releasing forms. Santilli felt immediately the wart of the organization at Harvard that kept him without a salary from his own grant for an entire year, even though he had a family with two young children to attend and barely managed to survive with unemployment benefits. The rest of the study is reviewed in Post 2 of this blog. The problem for the organization is that, unlike preceding dissident physicists, Santilli loved America too much and decided to stay. This was extremely disturbing for the organization that, continuously increased the attacks against Santilli to inexaplicable extremes of human and scientific misconduct that eventually lead to this lawsuit. To really understand the criminal conduct and character of the organization one should know that, in view of his continuation of research beyond Einstein, Santilli has been the victim of various life threats for decades, see for instance the denunciation released by Santilli's supporters following the vicious attacks reported in Post 12 Documentation of life threats to Prof. Santilli which threats have been periodically reported to the FBI. So santilli is life his life with CIA type of recording equipment in his dress and car., all this happening in the United States of America while members of the organization are praised and hailed at all levels of society. What an evil and anti-American support! Fwqw40yu

Post 20.
Is there any way to stop this feud between Santilli an "organized interests on Eoinstein"? Caw11pp

Post 20.
Caw11pp, the resolution of the feud you indicate is quite simple: organized interests on Einstein should stop attacking Santilli. Then he would have no reason to respond, and he never initiated attacks in any case. Gre24uo

Post 20.
I visited Harvard in 1978 as a prospective incoming physics graduate student, where I met with Shelly Glashow and Sidney Coleman. I was later to work with Steve Weinberg as a graduate student. I am not at all surprised by these reports of their poor behavior. My impression of both Glashow and Weinberg is that they were socially immature, and arrogant. I was personally bullied by them to differing degrees. I felt these two were politically unsophisticated, but I suspect claims of behaviors of this kind are much more likely to have originated with John A. Wheeler, a mentor of Weinberg's, and of whose background, motivations, and means I am well acquainted. John Wheeler was a savvy, effective political operative who managed departments, politics and money. Wheeler's reputation hinged entirely on Einstein's relativity, and Wheeler knew how to cover his own tracks. Compared to the political sophistication of Dr. Wheeler -- a close friend of Nixon and Kissinger - - Drs. W einberg and Glashow were naive agents. Qew36ou

Post 21.
Qew36ou should be praised for his dignity and courage, but his pPst 20 needs clarifications.The "immaturity" of Weinberg and Glashow can be cleaned solely when they deal with us "gentiles" (meaning "inferior" in Hebrew as thought since childhood in Synagogues). When dealing with their brothers, they were great! I remember vividly that, when I was at Harvard in the early 1980s dreaming for a physics position there, Weinberg, Glashow and Coleman provided an incredible organized support of Refuse-nick physicists from Russia under fake claim of persecution in their land. All these Refuse-nicks all find an academic job on arrival, while we American physicists were cut out. The discrimination again qualified American physicists reached truly offensive overtones with of seminars at Harvard from these Refuse-nicks. I attended one of them and was shocked to see local physicists strongly applauding statements by these speakers that, for a seminar at Harvard, are like 2 + 2 = 4. The applauses were then used for confirming the pre-set academic jobs, I though I was having a nightmare, but the organized nation-wide discrimination of highly qualified American scientists in favor of semi- illiterate Refuse-nicks grew to the point that I left Harvard in a state of great disappointment and revulsion. Bq[-2rt

Post 22.
From Post 2: "The vicious attacks in corporate blogs by Frank Israel and Pepijin (sic) van Erp have been so organized, relentless and vulgar to cause millions of dollars of losses in the value of the stock owned by tens of thousands of stockholders (see the sworn Affidavits of corporate officers in the attachments of indicated first filing)" I have examined the filing and attachments. No such Affadavit(s), sworn or otherwise, exist. Vsa45uo, please explain this inconsistency. Mmm33tt

Post 23.
Hello , the motion with the two Affidavits I indicated at the end is at the top of the list of public documents,
http://www.galileoprincipia.org/Lawsuit-against-Frank-Israel-and-Pepijn-van-Erp/0%20Doc.%20064%20P%20Motion%20Preliminary%20Injunction%20.pdf
I am told that the two executives have already been interrogated by the defendant attorneys and provided evidence of large financial losses caused to thousands of stockholders of two U. S. public companies by Frank Israel and his associates. I understand hat particular emphasis has emerged on the fact that we are dealing with foreigners causing the assassination of undesired research in the United States of America. Vsa45uo

Post 24.
I believe that the slanderous attacks of Santilli's research by Frank Israel and his associates of the Dutch Skeptic Society, done via illegal SEO techniques assuring their appearance at the top under Google searches, constitute one of the darkest moments of science for the evident reason that said attacks have propagated throughout the scientific community, by therefore assassinating at birth any desire to pursue basically new scientific knowledge. The dishonesty by Frank Israel and his associates is easily proved by the fact that, for instance, they supports the search for dark matter and dark energy even though considered fake sciences (see Section III.4 and III.5 of Debate on Cosmology) because they are compatible with Einstein theories, while they attack as fraud Santilli's search for antimatter galaxies because violating said theories. This gloomy scenario is reinforced by evidence apparently gathered by an investigative agency according to which Frank Israel and his Skeptic Society acted under a mandate from Arthur Rubin, David Epstein, and Mark Bernstein at Wikipedia-Google complex in support of their slanderous "Article" on Santilli to prevent the acceptance of his broadening of Einstein theories. As it was the case for the Roman Empire, I fear that the United States of America have lost their world leadership at its peak because Americans have permitted the "organized cartel on Einstein and its liberal associates to achieve control of academia, news media, the U. S. President (including President Trump of lately), The U. S. Congress, the Federal Reserve and the Nobel Foundation. Said control is then used for dictatorial, anti-American aims against the hosting society, as it happened five centuries ago in Spain, one century ago in Germany, ago, in the U.S.A with the Manhattan Project that resulted in the biggest blunder of the judicial systems because the messengers of the treason (the Rosenberggs) were caught, convicted, prosecuted and executed, but the real perpetrators of the passing the atomic bomb secrets to their brothers in Russia (the physicists of the Manhattan Project) were never prosecuted !, Ruggero and Carla Santilli have been the sole Americans I know to date who have opposed the conduction of science by the organized cartel on Einstein via slander and defamation. Other Americans in academia and elsewhere, have supinely accepted the systematic assassination of scientific democracy either because of illusory gains, or because of complicity via silence. But then, it is written in history that people have the institutions they want or deserve. Nds23io

Post 25.
I understand that the Santillis have been deposed. Can anybody report the outcome? I am particularly interested to knwo possible evidence of this blatant conspiracy against them. Bds23yo